My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1991
>
01-14-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2024 10:39:28 AM
Creation date
5/13/2024 10:35:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1990 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS CONTINUED <br />such events. <br />Bellows also stated that she had comments pertaining to item <br />14 on the agenda and questioned whether she should comment at <br />this time or when item #4 is discussed. <br />Mayor Grabek suggested that Bellows delay her comments until <br />item #4 is presented. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br />Ms. Linda Whitman, 3620 Eileen Street, presented a petition <br />on behalf of persons with a specific position regarding the <br />Highway 12 Corridor location. Ms. Whitman read the petition and <br />noted that it was signed by over 3 50 people. She said, "Many of <br />the people who signed this petition indicated that they prefer <br />th<» Highway 12 corridor to be as far north as possible. They are <br />not in favor of the County Road 6, present Highway 12, or Luce <br />Line locations. The petition does not specifically express this <br />point of view, but I would like the Council to understand that is <br />the position of many citizens." <br />A <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR*S REPORT: <br />•1334 RBBBRS CONSTRUCTION-SUGARWOODS PLAT <br />PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO PRO <br />Mr. Sid Rebers and Mr. Stephen Pflaum, <br />present. <br />his Attorney, were <br />Bernhardson explained that two resolutions were being <br />presented this evening that pertained to the review process for <br />driveways in the Sugarwoods Plat. He said, "One resolution <br />requires that the Planning Commission and Council participate in <br />the review process. The driveway request would be reviewed by <br />the Planning Commission and would then be scheduled for the <br />Council meeting immediately following. The other resolution <br />would permit only the Planning Commission to review these <br />requests. Council would only become involved in the event of an <br />appeal." <br />Mabusth added that she had not received any additional <br />information from the Planning Commission subsequent to their <br />November 19th meeting. <br />Bellows stated that she had comments on behalf of the <br />Planning Commission to make at this time. <br />Mayor Grabek asked her to proceed with her comments. <br />Bellows said, "The Planning Commission has, from the <br />beginning, objected to the use of templates in lieu of Planning <br />Commission and Council review. We feel that there does need to <br />- 2 - <br />, ^ - HJif'i* •I'i 1' I _- . L
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.