Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br /> � <br /> BEVE�2 <br /> LAN�SCAPI NG <br /> 3. Fences shall not be constructed within the defined lakeshore yard of a lakeshore <br /> lot, i.e., shall not be within 75 feet of the shoreline... (continues.) (Sec. 78-1405. <br /> (7) b. 3.) <br /> The other codes that speak directly toward the design of entrance gates do not further specify or <br /> alter the permissible height, thereby making the codes for fences solely applicable (code (8) h). <br /> Only the height and location of entrance monuments have been outlined in detail, as it states: <br /> (8) a. Each monument, with a maximum of two, shall be limited to a single pillar with a <br /> footprint measuring no larger than 25 square feet and no length to exceed five <br /> feet; <br /> (8) b. The monument must be setback a minimum of five feet from all property <br /> boundaries and never fewer than ten feet from the edge of a paved, traveled <br /> roadway; .... <br /> (8) e. The monuments are limited to eight feet in height including any appurtenances. <br /> Any monument exceeding the mczximum height must meet the principal structure <br /> setback requirements; <br /> (8)f. When more than one monument is proposed a minimum horizontal width of 12 <br /> feet is required between <br /> them; (Sec. 78-1405. (8)) <br /> In light of these codes, it is understood that eight-foot monuments and a four-foot gates are what <br /> is considered permissible on this property. But I would like to sincerely ask for this to be <br /> reconsidered for the sake of the security, design, and stylistic implications that this imposes. <br /> The 1535 Bohns Point address has an almost legendry status among the community, in the <br /> reputation of its previous homeowners. This property draws attention, and it is common for <br /> people to walk or drive into the property and look around as if a public space. Since residing <br /> there, the current homeowners, as well as contractors working on the property, have experienced <br /> vandalism and periy theft inside the property. The homeowners also currently have 6 children <br /> under the age of 13. In spite of this, the pre-existing security measures on the grounds (driveway <br /> probe sensors and laser eye sensors)have been entirely deactivated, and there is no intention to <br /> fence the perimeter of the property. But the homeowners do want the security of a taller gate and <br /> monument structure with communications to the house. This will be the only significant line of <br /> security and structural barrier other than the trees bordering the property, and it is important for <br /> them to have a taller, more prominent gate. <br />