Laserfiche WebLink
RONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />^ 9, 1992 <br />T. OMLIE, <br />ission tabled the portion of the <br />for additional hardcover. The <br />s with the side setback was <br />>lannlng Commission to allow the <br />designs for the roof structure, <br />tion of the project requires <br />le property. <br />by Butler, to adopt Resolution <br />Mil lam and Rhonda 0ml Ie, 1B60 <br />variance for the addition to the <br />condition that hardcover remain <br />-lUS, <br />request 6 ~ it = I <br />grade-1 eve I jooi. meet the <br />dence would have to be located <br />,e. She stated the new residence <br />inding residences and noted the <br />ont of the proposed location. <br />illy define lineal shoreline <br />lakeshore setback variance to <br />ade level pool, as amended. Ayes <br />)KOE, <br />>N «3197 <br />sre present to represent the <br />■r-m• I■ ■ <br />. :v <br />> : <br />V <br />r'-< <br />'-4\y. <br />'■y ■■ •i-.-V ■•: <br />til <br />-r'' ,• •■-r-.-'i V > V'.f-.-.v- • *• X-- <br />■t:. .. <br />•i':*.- . ■ : <br />V ^ ■ -y <br />'v <br />■ ■■ iyti <br />■ US <br />v::^'/lt :V . • <br />’• * • If . <br />M.: i <br />■:v <br />\ <br />o <br />o <br />1 <br />izJ <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 9, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1771 - CONT. <br />Mabusth explained the original 1976 subdivision granted lot width <br />variances for the properties. A drainage maintenance application <br />permit was issued to a series of landowners in the area who <br />received benefits from the project. The spoils from that dredging <br />were placed on this property, and the City had warned at that time <br />that it may impact future development of the property and septic <br />sites. The owners are currently having a problem locating a septic <br />system for a four bedroom home on the northern lot. The lot line <br />rearrangement would provide both lots with primary and alternate <br />septic sites. Mabusth noted with a previous subdivision of property <br />to the south the City required a 17* right-of-way easement, which <br />the Markoe property cannot satisfy without encroaching the septic <br />sites. The Council requested an 8 1/2* right-of-way easement with <br />a previously approved lot line rearrangement for this property, but <br />the process was never completed. She recommended the Council <br />consider these properties as having riparian access per the new <br />shoreline regulations, which would mean the properties conform to <br />the lot width requirements at the shoreline. <br />Jabbour noted there is room on the northern lot for a septic system <br />for a two bedroom home. He felt the Community has very diverse <br />housing and he felt that is needed. <br />Callahan felt only being able to build a two bedroom house on a <br />property is not a hardship. <br />Goetten questioned the need for a 50* right-of-way. <br />Don Peterson explained in 1990 his company owned the southern lot <br />and at that time they knew the septic system was feasible. Mrs. <br />Axel owned the northern lot and at that time it was realized that <br />the property would only support a two bedroom home because of the <br />septic requirements. The Markoes then purchased both properties <br />with the intent to build one house on both lots, but were <br />transferred out of State recently. Ho noted the requirement of a <br />17’ right-of-way easement would encroach two septic systems on the <br />western lot line. He felt the entire parcel would require someone <br />to build a $800,000’** house, which the neighborhood does not <br />support. <br />Callahan asked if the Markoes had planned to build that type of <br />house. <br />Don Peterson said he had not seen their plans, but felt the Markoes <br />would not get their money out of the property if it sold as one <br />parceI. <br />4 <br />• ■ :i <br />V-'.' <br />• s: <br />U'. <br />!I;' <br />i '' ■ <br />V