My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
11-23-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
4/23/2024 1:44:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
► i <br />: > <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 23, 1992 <br />LICENSE DENIAL - GAYLES MARINA - CONT. <br />Gaffron notad that the owner of the marina has been advised of this <br />action and has made no attempt to contact the City. • <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt <br />Resolution #3204, denying the application of Gayle's Marina for a <br />1992 Commercial Marina License, with the paragraph beginning with <br />"further be It resolved" deleted from that resolution. Ayes 4, nays <br />0. Jabbour abstained. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to direct staff to <br />commence enforcement of non-comp Iianc^ procedures. <br />Gaffron explained the only enforcement clause of •’he code requires <br />this to be handled as a misdemeanor and be Isi.ed a tag for the <br />violation of operating without a license. He stated there is not <br />a code section requiring the operation to cease because of the lack <br />of a Iicense. <br />Callahan felt only one ticket should be issued to the owner and <br />added the property contains violations of the zoning code, which <br />may provide other methods of enforcement. He felt the City should <br />not consider litigation at this point. He stated the City will be <br />considering new marina licensing regulations in the near future <br />which will provide a more effective means for enforcing such non- <br />compliance issues. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour abstained. <br />(#S) INITIAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE - PHEASANT LAWN HOMEOWNERS' <br />ASSOCIATION - RESOLUTION #3205 <br />Mr. Forrer was present to represent the Association. <br />Gaffron explained this is a request, perhaps 20+ years late, to <br />al low a multiple dock system within the Pheasant Lawn subdivision. <br />He stated the area was dredged In the late 1940s to create access <br />via a channel to the lake. Five of the slips are associated with <br />the multiple dock and a sixth dock is associated with an adjacent <br />property owner. The homeowners' association was formed In 1979, <br />many years after the docks were installed. There have not been any <br />complaints. The code requires a Joint dock license to be Issued for <br />the installation of such, but under the current code. If the system <br />were proposed as new, could not be allowed due to requirement of <br />minimum width of lots for each slip. Lot 14 functions as an outlot. <br />Jabbour felt they should be careful not to set a precedent, and <br />noted the need to treat people equitably.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.