Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 23, 1992 <br />ZONING FILES 91493 A 1570 - CONT. <br />Mabusth explained, per a recent letter from Mr. Downey that he is <br />rtot proceeding with the structural Improvements. In 1982 the City <br />granted approval of setback variances for the installation of a <br />detached garage and hardcover In the 75-250* setback area was <br />approved at 45*. In the current hardcover Inventory, hardcover was <br />shown at 59* due to a change in policy regarding the calculation <br />of hardcover. During the 1982 review It was suggested that the <br />applicant provide a back-out apron. During the most current review, <br />the City Engineer advised that the apron could not function <br />properly because of the location of Casco Point Road. The applicant <br />has obtained a permit for the deck. The applicant questions the <br />need to now remove the hardcover scheduled for removal per the <br />approval resolution. <br />Butler clarified that the hardcover removals were scheduled to off­ <br />set the additional construction, which has not happened. She felt <br />If the conftruction does .*iot occur, the hardcover scheduled for <br />removal can remain. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to direct staff with <br />regard to Applications #1493 and #1570 for Chuck Downey of 2665 <br />Casco Point Road to t. require the hardcover removals on the <br />property provided a building permit is not issued for additional <br />construction. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#7) LICENSE DENIAL - GAYLES MARINA - RESOLUTION #3204 <br />Jabbour abstained from discussion of this item. <br />Gaffron stated the City Attorney has suggested changes to the draft <br />resolution deleting reference to the number of slips allowed, as <br />the code does not directly address this issue and it should not be <br />a reason for denial of a license. <br />Butler asked If a Judge would laugh at the City because of the lack <br />of past enforcement of the licensing requirement. <br />Barrett felt che City has decided to now proceed formally with the <br />license requirement. He noted the resolution does not suggest <br />denial of the license due to past history of the property. <br />Callahan suggested deletion of the paragraph beginning with <br />“further be it resolved”. <br />Barrett felt that would be appropriate and did not <br />necessary to wait until December 31st to take action. <br />feel