My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
11-23-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
4/23/2024 1:44:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M <br />STATI OF <br />Ldepartment of natural resourcesWaters, 1200 warher road, st. paul, mn ssioe <br />monino. («12) 772-791*file NO <br />October 30, 1992 <br />The Honorable Barbara Peterson <br />Mayor, City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 1B4 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Dear Mayor Peterson: <br />REVIEW AMD COMMENT ON CITY OF EXCELSIOR'S REQUEST FOR FLEXIBILITY <br />FROM STATE OF MINNESOTA'S SHORELANO MANAGEMENT STANDARDS <br />As required by the statewide shoreland nanaqexent standards, the <br />CoBsiissioner of the Minnesota Departnent of Natural Resources (DNR) <br />and the City of Excelsior are hereby notifying your city of <br />Excelsior's request for flexibility fro* the statewide standard as <br />outlined below, and in the enclosure prepared by the city's <br />consultant. In accordance with the rules, the Coaaissioner and the <br />city Bust solicit the input and approval of other govemaental <br />bodies that crrnJd be affected or iapacted by the alternate <br />controls. The city and the DNR are asking that your city provide <br />its rsvisw sMd coswsnts, if sny^ to sithsr DHR or ths city within <br />45 days of Che cate of this letter. If no response is received <br />prior to then, we will assuae that your city has no concerns with <br />the neighboring c ty's proposal. <br />The City of Excelsior is requesting flexibility froa the following <br />statewide stan^rds: <br />1. <br />3. <br />3. <br />Building heignt. <br />Lot site and width. <br />Application of General Developaent standards to a <br />Recreational Developaent lake, and <br />4. lapervious surface coverage. <br />Since the city's request is coiqplex, a thorough discussion of this <br />reouest is attached for you and/or your staff to review. The above <br />r^.t. IMV. bMn pr...nt«l by mcl.ior'. r.pr.^t«tiv. for <br />review and discussion by representatives of 11 Lake Minnetonka <br />eitiu who «r. oorklm toqotb-»r u • T.ehnie.1 R.vl.« for <br />^ne purpose of reviewing and discussing individual city s <br />flexibility requests affecting Lake Minnetonka. No probltts with <br />the city's request have been noted at any of those aeetings. <br />AN EQUAL OneOSTUM^'^ |V»L0'^i‘^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.