Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1737 <br />November 3, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />record of ever Issuing permits for the lakeside gazebo or grade <br />level decking* The total structure consists of 735 s.f* or 4.9% <br />hardcover* The recent survey of the property also reveals a <br />screened porch structure with decking (308 s*f*) that the City <br />has no record of a permit being issued* The structure is older <br />and in need of repairs* <br />Review Exhibits F(l>4)* In a 1974 variance review, the garage <br />addition was approved with an add on deck to the lakeside* Based <br />on the minutes, it appears a lakeside deck did not have to meet <br />the 75* lakeshore setback* Note the existing screen house that <br />is located in the lakeshore yard was not shown on the survey of <br />1974 as was the detached garage that was to be removed as a <br />condition of that variance approval* Review Exhibits G through <br />H* In 1982 the original decking on the lakeside of the house was <br />enclosed* In 1982 intensification of structures located within <br />substandard setbacks or where excessive hardcover existed did not <br />require variance approvals* <br />Application #1737 deals merely with variances required to allow <br />the lakeshore deck and gazebo structures to remain* Lakeshore <br />structures of this type would have required variance approvals <br />based on ordinances in place since 1974* Applicant contends that <br />the structures were built prior to the 1987 storm and the gazebo <br />rebuilt as part of the storm damage repair* No building permits <br />issued during that period would have allowed the construction of <br />decks and gazebos located within the 75* setback area* Residents <br />would have been advised to apply for the necessary variances* <br />The storm damage building permit was issued specifically and <br />written to cover only land alterations/retaining wall <br />installations and the repair of principal structure damaged <br />during storm was to conform to a building permit issued in 1982, <br />refer to Exhibits 6, I and J* <br />Planning GoaBd.salcm Review and OoasMnts <br />The application was reviewed at both the May and October meetings <br />of the Planning Commission* The final amended plan offered 192 <br />s.f* of hardcover removals in the 0-75* and 449 s.f* within the <br />75-250* setback area* Planning Commission meiEbers asked for <br />additional resiovals and requested the removal of the screen house <br />and attached decking consisting of 308 s.f* of additional <br />hardcover within the 0-75* setback area* Final hardcover <br />removals are reflected in the facts noted above* <br />The Planning Commission recommendation consisted of approving <br />setback and hardcover variances to allow the grade level deck to <br />remain in the lakeshore yard consisting of 312 s.f* or 2% <br />additional hardcover. Total hardcover within the 0-75* setback <br />area is proposed at 25.31 (original 28*6%). Planning Commission