My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
11-09-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2024 1:38:30 PM
Creation date
4/22/2024 1:34:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
392
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITYof ORONO <br />Munidpal OfBces <br />Post Ofte Box 66 <br />Cr>3tal Bay* Minnesota 55323-0066 <br />October 26, 1992 <br />Mr. Jim Dunn <br />Lakeside Marina <br />3324 North Shore Drive <br />Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 <br />Dear Mr. Dunn: <br />As we discussed this morning, I have not yet drafted the license <br />denial resolutions per the Council directive of August 24th. As you <br />recall. Council denied your license because: <br />A, Landscape plantings along the east property line are not in <br />compliance with the 1975 Operations Plan nor the 1981 <br />approved landscaping/planting plan. <br />B. Storage of materials was occurring in the east side <br />, landscape area. <br />After the Council m^t^tirg, ' ''u and I met on the site and you had <br />removed all stored materials from the east side landscape area. <br />Because you feel the City har jt provided acceptable plantings as <br />part of the sewer rerouting project, you wish to further cxscuss the <br />landscaping requirements. <br />I am attaching a copy of the 1981 landscape plan which indicates trees <br />and shrubs existing in 1980 and additional ones'proposed for <br />The 1981 plantings were clearly intended to fill in between the <br />columnar evergreens. Given the potential for changes in use of e <br />property to your east, I agree that screening along this side deserves <br />additional discussion. <br />At their October 14th meeting, the Lake Use Committee discussion <br />resulted in general agreement that marina activity <br />be limited by specific numbers of boats, but should be dealt with <br />based on maintaining landscaping and setback envelopes. Defining <br />those envelopes for each marina is a task that will have to accou, <br />for historical practice and past variances while attempting to yieia <br />an intensity of use that is perceived as generally acceptable to <br />Council members and public. <br />TtLEPHOVE -473.T357 • FAX-«7M510
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.