10-12-1992 Council Minutes2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Gaffron said he will ask the City Engineer to review the plan tor comments but the Engineer will not be making any formal changes to the plan. That will be the responsibility of the applicants. (#4) #1755 LEONARD NISKA, 2304 SHADYWOOD ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING -7:50 - 8:08 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mai ling were noted. Leonard Niska was present for this aoplication. Gaffron stated the proposal require.^ setback variances, and the property has an excess of hardcover. The original garage to the rear of the property encroached the right-of-way, but that has been removed. The applicant was advised to get a survey, which he did. Sometime after it was discovered that the shed was placed In its present location. The shed is in line with the front of the house, which does not meet the required setback from the street. Chair Kelley stated the shed could not be placed in front, of the house because that would create a sighting problem. • Rowlette said that it cannot be placed In the rear of the house because that does not leave an area to park. Bellows reviewed the requirement for a 10’ separation setback, but felt that was not an issue here because the property has access from both Shadywood Road and Olive Avenue. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bel lows, to recommend approval of Application #1755 for Leonard Niska, 2304 Shadywood Road, for after-the-fact conditlona' use permit and variances for a shed, conditioned on if a garage is proposed. It would have to be an attached garage, and it or any other structure to be built on the property wouId require the removaI of the shed, and the appIicant paying the required penalty fees. Ayes 7, nays 0. (#5) #1761 MARK A. HUNSLEY, 3464 EASTLAKE STREET - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - PUBLIC HFACING C:08 - 8:13 P.M. The AffidavIt of Publication and Certificate of Mai I Ing were noted. Mark Hunsley was present for thi. appI Ica 11 on. Gaffron explained with the plat of Baysl^e Beach, an outlet was created to accommodate the r-ay water mound septic systems for the three adjacent lots. All th.ee property owners technically own the outlot, but only one is listed as owner for tax purposes. The 12’x16’ shed is used by all the neighbors for the storage of I av;n equipment. The shed is set back 5.9’ from the street and encroaches in the 10’ drainage and utility easement. The Public Works Department has confirmed that this has not created a proolem with the installation of sanitary sewer. There is a fence near the shed and a large willow tree around It so It is not visible from the street. He explained that the code does not designate setbacks for outlots, but If it were ♦'o meet the setbacks of the 2 acre zoning district, it would need to meet a 50’ setback which would place It in the middle of the outlot, thus becoming more obvious. Bel lows asked how they address the issue of having an accessory structure without a principal structure.