Laserfiche WebLink
WATKR STRUCTURHS COMMITIHi:September 12, l*J*J2 <br />MOT I ON Rascop moveil. Carlson socondctl. to refer the City of <br />Orono Ordinance prohibiting the use <br />dock flotation device to the Hoard <br />ber. fhe Orotio Orditiance will be <br />Orilinance. A letter is to be sent <br />them of the committee nclioti. <br />VOTK: Motion carried unanimously. <br />of non-encased styrofoam as a <br />for a public hearing in Octo- <br />used as a basis for any LM(!I.) <br />to the City of oron<» advising <br />6. Multiple Dock License Violations. <br />Thibault reported on the multiple dock license violations <br />discovered during the aiuiual boat storage inventory and/or annual <br />multiple dock inspections. <br />She reported letters have been sent to violators of the <br />following: <br />A. Homeowner As soc i .11 i on s that put in seasonal docks dif­ <br />ferent than their site plons. They were advised they have to <br />to the site plan or submit a new site plan, <br />boats not stored in a designated boat <br />c o n f o r m <br />B. <br />insm. <br />c. <br />boa t s. <br />U. <br />lion. <br />E. <br />storaie unit <br />A Vachl Club with an unlicensed plat form for two smalt <br />One condominium with a major change in dock configura- <br />nne Homeowner As soc i a t i of) with a resident who insists on <br />ski is in the dock use area, over the licensedjet <br />were 12 to <br />pu11ing his two <br />number of USU. <br />Thibault reported that out of licensees there <br />13 who wore written letters for license violations. <br />During the boat count she found the followine; <br />A. When inspecting residential tiocks with suspected boat <br />storage violaliona. it is difficult to determine tl»e boat license <br />numbers because they are obscured by canopies and boat covers. <br />She concentrated on contacting those with fiver or eiore boats <br />first. ^ ^ . <br />B. Slie observed some sma I I i>ut lots wfieie there nave t»cen <br />three or foui bouts stored since before tlie current ordinances <br />were adopted, allowing them to be g r and f a t he retl. <br />r. Mt»st of the complaints received at the office ur® <br />neighbors comploininf about encroachment into ihwir lM»ck <br />D. There were two specific cases of adjacent residential <br />sites combining dock use areas for a multiple dock with 5 or •o*’* <br />boats. When advised that « multiple dock liten«»e Is required for <br />a flock with 5 or m** *e noats, tlie resi’Ivnts comp I s i ned. <br />coMients we I e that by combining docks thev h’nl less ii^iicl <br />Ison suggested there could be s differeni muUiiile d.»ck <br />license classification for residents who have coaibined l>ock Use <br />Areas. isscop noted ndveftisemen I • In the gaper selling <br />out lots for dockage. . .i • a. -ieeulaltons on boat stoiase si oet lots and resMtrniisI aHes <br />•ere eiptamed he SircMMen end Thibault. <br />f rom <br />l>sr <br />Their <br />un I tie <br />i