Laserfiche WebLink
WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE Suplcniln?r 12, 190 2 <br />P <br />1 <br />A. Draft of Ordinance authorizing executive director to iasue <br />deicing licenses. The committee received two drafts of amend­ <br />ments to the deicing ordinance from LeFevere. Option 1 wouhl <br />Allow the executive director to issue renewal deicina licenses <br />with no violations or alleged vit> lotions the prior season without <br />Board action and for all other applications the executive direc­ <br />tor could issue a prov i s i on a j J_i subject tt) Boaid approval. <br />Option 2 would allow the executive director to issue renewal <br />licenses without action by the Board provided there were no <br />violations or alleged violations during the term of the prior <br />season. In the case of all other applications and in cases in <br />which the Executive Director determines not to issue a license <br />for any reason, the appiication sha I I be releried to the Board ol <br />D i rectors. <br />Babcock reviewed the cv e r letter from I, e F e v e r e . d ii t e d <br />9/2/92. in which LeFevere discourages option I. which allows <br />granting a provisional license subject t»» later action by the <br />Board. <br />(irathwol said the second option submitted by i.efevere makes <br />I he mo St I a c l i r a 1 *. «mi s e . The e x ■ u l i v d i i <•» I«»f would have I •» <br />set up a ptucediire lor new applications and Ihut would give the <br />committee and Hoard time to iliscuss them. <br />MOTION: Oralhwol moved. Johnstone seconded, to recommend Amend­ <br />ment Option 2 to the ordinance relating to deicing equipment on <br />l.iike Minnetonka, ns submitted by Attorney LeFevere. <br />VOTE: Motion coiried unanimously. <br />Ordinance regulating the use of styrofoam in5. C!ity of <)rf>iio <br />dock construction. <br />The committee received a copy of the City of r^rono t>rdinance <br />prohibiting the use of non-ciicased styrofoam as a dock flotalloni <br />device. <br />Babcock said he would like to see the LMCD adopt .somethingi <br />along the same lines. He noted Murr thought the 12\JI\94 compli­ <br />ance date was too soon. The committee, in previous d i s cus.s i ons . <br />recommended a five yciir period within which to come into compli­ <br />ance (Marino oporotors also requested Orono to consider t ivf <br />years. ) . <br />Carlson naked about the useful life of styrofonis. Babcock <br />said there are some styrofoam docks whicli have iKen in use for ft <br />long period of time. Rascop suggested the use of styrofoam i» <br />dock consliuctlon could be limited to five year**. Cftrlson said <br />two years for iemoial would he Ishort a period ••( i imv .is <br />Iheie could be a financial liaMlship on the maiin.i opernt«>f. <br />Babcock suggested 1 years and a I tow n petition for s loneer lime. <br />Carlson did not agree with a petition proceas. He said there <br />should he a d«te certain ftod no repairs to h*- i«||i*wrd to the <br />docks. <br />Johnsttoie suggesietl adopting the ordinance ne refer­ <br />ence. Ihe executive director observed that wost of the sterofoam <br />docks are In the Cite of Orono. The LMCO should want to present <br />anv new styrofo.xm dock I net a I I at ions . He noted stvrof..am is also <br />used In swiaeslns docks smi buoys.