Laserfiche WebLink
I.MCU nOAKI) OF DIRFCTORS August 26, 19'J2 <br />tfic coininit- <br />X 84 * tlock <br />said it was <br />clock asked <br />need any more <br />api>) icat ion to <br />tee voted on a <br />H. Multifile Dock License? Renewals — coniftiiitce reconitncnd i nf; <br />approvai. <br />I) Way/ata Yacht Club-Site 2, Wayzata May. Wayzata <br />MOTION: Uabcock moved. (Jiathwol seconded, to a improve the Water <br />Structures Committee recommendation for approval of the Wayzata <br />Yacht ('luh-Sitc? 2 amendment with a ttew site plan ^eplncin^t the <br />platform on the island with a seasonal dock 6’ wide x 40* Iona, <br />noting tlwit no boat storage is allowed at this dock. <br />DISCUSSION: Babcock said it was his impression titat <br />tee had agreed u|»on a (> ’ x 84’ dock to replace the 24 <br />previously approved in IP86. Cochran and OratliMol <br />their recollection the ajiproval was for the b' x 40“ <br />for in the application. It is a seasonal dock. <br />Don Blaser. Wayzata Yacht Club, said their 19Sb application <br />cal led for a 24* x 84’ dock. It was not bui It because the need <br />did mit exist. Currently the WVC would like approval for the 6* <br />X 84’ so they could build it as tjceded. Ihis year they do not <br />th/in ti * X 40*. Cochran suggested amending the <br />a b' X 84’ dock. Ilurr resfionded that the coimnit- <br />40’ (lock and that is wb.it the WN«’ .ipplicd lor. It <br />is her feeling that the applicant should have to come back to the <br />committee for a change. She said this also raises the question <br />of the Board approving a dock that may not be built to full size. <br />MOTION CIIANOK: Babcock and (ir.ithwol aareed to ch.intre t lie dock <br />dimension in the motion from b* x 4o’ to 6* x .84’. accepting <br />Slocum’s suggestion to add "to meet proffer setb.icks. <br />IHSCUSSION: Jo.h'islone asked if there is any significant public <br />policy involved in the length change. Babcock said the dock size <br />conforms to the ordinance at 40’ or 84’ as lone os it meets <br />setback requirements. <br />blaser explained the dock is used bv the Lake Minnetonk.a <br />Sailing School as a mukc-ready dock. The boats are stored on <br />land. No boats are storcil on the dock overnight. M.sikus asked <br />about the density increase to the wvf license when the Sailing <br />School bool count increases to as many as 80 boats. a> mentiontol <br />by Blaser. Blaser said the boats are used by n - *4 year old <br />children for sailing instruction and the boat count will only <br />increase as the demand for lessons increases. Not all of the <br />boats will be in the water -st one time. Blaser added that there <br />is absolutely no flow of funds from the Luke Mi line tonka Sailing <br />School to the WY<*. Blaser added th.it this in a f.icilitv th-il the <br />WYC allows the Sailing School to use free of choree. Responding <br />to n question f i om tlrnthwol. l-oster sold thete are tfiree sailitis <br />•choois on the Lake. <br />Iefevere raised an issue, not necessaiily relitive to this <br />opplication. but one everyone should be mindful of. That 4a the <br />laattt of oil lake storage and the number of hosts tH»t c t'’ »*e <br />stored off lake under the cuirent I’ode. This application does <br />not change the number ol boats stored off L."ikr. 4 be off lake <br />atoiage Ordin.ifue it severely restrictive. I he applicnnt ought <br />not asaume. under current i>rdinanett. that they tan increase the <br />number of eatercr.ift stored off the Lake above the nusdver in this <br />apfil lest ion .