08-24-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Soring Lake Park — Storw water management Plan for street improvements> It was moved by Manager Thomas and seconded by Manager Lindley that this permit application be removed from the table with a limit of three minutes for discussion. John CarwacKi of Shell Engineering appeared on behalf of the applicant. H® j indicated that the concerns raised by the Engineer will be handled by routing the runoff into a detention basin and then into the lake. Currently# the storm water runoff goes directly from the roadway into the lake. As a result# the change in design will significantly improve water quality. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Thomas that the application be approved with issuance of the permit to be based upon receipt of revised plans in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer which would route the storm water runoff into a detention basin before it drains into the lake. Upon vote# the matter carried unanimously. la. Inc. --92-1IS. Dftftr Bun Weial_ Plan for the extension of all municipal utilitiea^ QmdifHF K’ reet conatruetien for Deer Run Eighth Addition It was moved by Manager Thomas and seconded by Manager Lindley that the application be removed from the table with a limit of thi.ee minutes for discussion. Upon vote# the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Smith of Engelhardt Engineers appeared on behalf of the applicant and explained to the Managers that the remaining exhibit to be provided would not be a problem for the developer. He further explained that the Victoria City Council would meet prior to the next meeting of the Board of Managers. Since the matter had previously received approval of the City's Planning Commission# the applicant anticipated that there would be no problem receiving approval of the Victoria City Council. Manager Thomas moved approval of the permit with issuance of the permit to be based upon resc tion of outstanding issues as set forward in the Engineer's report to the satisfaction of the Engineer and based upon a’jproval by the City of Victoria. The motion was seconded by Ma lager Love. Manager Lindley indicated again that he has an indirect financial interest in this project and thus would not participate in the discussion or vote. Upon vote# the motion carried with Managers Thomas# Love and Erickson voting in the affirmati'»c and Managers Spensley and LaBounty voting in the negative. Rleason Creek Improvement Project It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Thomas that the agenda be suspended and that the Gleason Creek project UCSD Board yinutw -8-(07/1«/92>