Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992 <br />Beth Whittaker further discussed the issue of sub-leasing. <br />She feels it would be important that the owner be allowed to do <br />this on the property but the owner should be held responsible for <br />the activities of that sub-lease. She would agree that if there <br />is an increase in parking demand because of charter boats» the <br />requirements should be met. Currently the LMCD licenses the <br />operation of charter boats so there is already some regulation on <br />how this is done. Jabbour added he had no confidence with the <br />LMCD. Whittaker again said, "Don't eliminate having a sub ­ <br />contractor come in to operate." Regulate bu+" don't eliminate <br />sub-contracting. Jabbour said it was important that one person <br />tied to the property owner would be the responsible person. <br />Kelley asked if the next time they met they could begin <br />reviewing the ordinance line by line. Callahan said they <br />couldn't because the ordinance as it stands is useless. <br />The concept of separating the licensing is a useful way to go <br />about revisions. Schroeder asked if there was any precedence. <br />Callahan noted the LMCD does not have their licensing tied into <br />land use. Debbie Breneman disagreed that the LMCD ties their <br />licensing to land use. <br />Who enforces the ordinances is not the concern of the <br />Committee at this point. Jabbour stated the Police Department is <br />already involve-i in licensing the marina such as for searching <br />activities of a Bass Tournament. There was disagreement about <br />the Police involvement in such a tournament. Gaffron stated that <br />^ Bass Clubr for a Bass Tournament would apply to the LMCD and the <br />u etiy.- Whittaker confirmed this as the^ are currently involved in <br />-'“this process. She said the LMCD and Water Patrol are contacted. <br />The Water Patrol then contacts other necessary people. <br />•f ^ <br />Jabbour stated that others were laughing at the confusion of <br />the Committee but they are trying to focus on relevant issues. <br />Dunn agreed they should take some notes and start developing the <br />ordinance. He had been at the last 2 or 3 meetings and wants to <br />see things moving forward. He has invited members to stop by and <br />visit so the ordinances can be developed and the Committee will <br />understand what the marina owners are doing. <br />Callahan asked if separating the activities and land <br />ordinances is the way to proceed. Schroeder stated the what he <br />thought they were trying to currently regulate was the relative <br />level of intrusiveness via land ordinances. Callahan agreed this <br />is the mechanism. Therefore, Schroeder felt the Committee should <br />go toward regulating the business rather through the setbacks, <br />etc. <br />Kelley asked if the marina section would have its own land <br />use section. Other members thought the land use would stay as a <br />separate section. Kelley envisioned the land use at the marinas <br />requiring variances to general land use ordinances so why not <br />develop their own standards within the licensing process. <br />Callahan felt it should not be within the licensing process since <br />the land use regulations tend to be ambiguous. Enforcing comes <br />4