Laserfiche WebLink
■fl■A <br /><S <br />up.. >The City's current base minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet The current Zoning Ordinance limits development on substandard lots to single family only provided that:1. The lot has been assessed for sewer and water.2. Setback and yard requirements shall be in compliance.Spring Park believes reliance on setbacks and impervious surface <br />limits control the environmental factors of development on small <br />lots, while protecting the development rights of the prooertv owners. e- tr j <br />Spring Park also currently has policies, which will be part of the <br />shoreland regulations, which requires consolidation of substandard <br />lots when reconstruction is proposed. Through this policy of lot <br />consolidation, single family density will actually decrease over <br />time. Spring Park hopes to continue this means of implementation <br />to promote private redevelopment of the substandard lots. <br />- - - - - - - - -- Spring Park's implementation will consist of <br />retaining the existing minimum lot sizes of 10,000 square feet <br />which currently conform to the DNR model standards for non-riparian <br />lots and require that where applicable, substandard lots be <br />required to be consolidated when redevelopment is proposed. Any <br />development on substandard lots will be required to comply will all <br />setback amd inpeivious surface stamdards. <br />''^4 <br />I#Si <br />m. <br />i|-^ <br />RESIDBMTIAL DENSITY <br />_ _ _ _ Id order to determine overall compliance with <br />the DNR density stamdards, a density calculati. .i was performed. <br />The purpose of the residential development denti / calculation is <br />to determine the maximum allowed by the DNR model and compare this <br />to the existing development conditions in Spring Park. <br />To determine the level of density increase that may be allowed, a <br />theoretical maucimum development scenario was calculated based upon <br />the residential density stamdards of the DNR. This exercise was <br />recommended by the DNR in other studies as a method to con^are the <br />City's existing shoreland development with what could be considered <br />to be a maximum "development cap". The exercise included <br />calculation of the gross residential zoning district acreage within <br />Tier I and Tier Il-V properties of the Shorelamd District. Tier I <br />properties are those which are riparian to the laUce to a depth of <br />200 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL). Tier II-V <br />properties include the non-riparian properties 200-1,000 feet from <br />the OHWL. <br />m <br />■SA MM