Laserfiche WebLink
•f <br />». <br />0S&. <br />fe. <br />llr.'' *ife.. <br />%r„ <br />w <br />te-s- <br />W' <br />LOT smBxintlna Conditions. Due to the historical development of Spring Park with small lot lake cottages, over two-thirds of the lots in Spring Park are under 15,000 square feet. Table 1 illustrates <br />existing City lot sizes. The historical develofsnent of the <br />shoreline with snail lots has also created a housing density which <br />is higher than allowed by DNR shoreland standards. Current City <br />policy controls development on substandard lots and encourages lot <br />consolidation. <br />TABLE 1 <br />EXISTING R-1, R-2, R-3 LOT SIZES <br />Lot Siae in Square Feet <br />9,999 or Less <br />10.000 - 14,999 <br />15.000 - 19,999 <br />20.000 or More <br />Total Number of Lots <br />102 <br />61 <br />35 <br />55 <br />253 <br />TABLE 2 <br />EXISTING R-1, R-2, R-3 LOT WIDTHS <br />Lot W:^dth <br />50 <br />51 <br />61 <br />76 <br />100 <br />Under <br />60 <br />75 <br />100 <br />Above <br />Total Number of Lots <br />109 <br />62 <br />33 <br />30 <br />19 <br />253 <br />Table 2 represents the existing condition of lot widths for parcels <br />within the R-l, R-2, and R-3 Districts. One hundred seventy-one <br />lots or 66 percent of the lots are 60 feet wide or less. Only 19 <br />lots are 100 feet wide or greater. As can be seen from the <br />existing lot size and width tsUbles, the majority of the lots are <br />15,000 square feet or less and under 75 feet wide. The potential <br />^to divide existing lo*-s is extremely limited due to the small <br />^rtte#%inount of existing lots large enough to divide. <br />Wifi' 'pfv' <br />%»■. ■