Laserfiche WebLink
This would appear to be at an approximate 975' elevation. My first <br /> exhibit with the red line shows the 100-year boundary I have <br /> estimated. It pushes substantially into the lot and would result in <br /> one corner of the home being about 40'from the boundary. (The <br /> other two exhibits provide support for the red line.) <br /> 3. Part of the proposed primary septic site is shown very close to the <br /> 100-year high water mark (see my first exhibit). <br /> 4. The secondary septic site is shown much less than 10 feet from the <br /> property boundary (what code would require). <br /> 5. Do we know yet what type of septic system is being proposed? <br /> Perhaps consider one of the more conservative options to minimize <br /> impact on the take. <br /> 6. As a suggestion, why not have the primary septic site at a higher <br /> elevation and further from the lake (e.g., simply switch which sites <br /> are primary and secondary)? <br /> 7. All existing homes surrounding Lydiard Lake to the north and east of <br /> 797 are at elevations of at least 990'. The proposed home would be <br /> going in at approximately 982' . <br /> 8. Will any pilings need to be sunk or any fill brought in to complete the <br /> construction as proposed? <br /> I realize these issues will need to be addressed as the project unfolds, but <br /> might it be a good idea to proceed cautiously before granting the average <br /> Lakeshore variance at this time? This would allow the Council to consider all <br /> required variances at one time, rather than piecemeal. As I have mentioned, <br /> with the proposal as-is, there would likely already be a need to grant a <br /> variance from the 150' home setback and the 10' septic setback. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to speak. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Mark A. Doepke <br /> 265 Hollander Road <br /> (612) 867-8829 <br /> mark@markdoepke.com <br /> 2 <br />