Laserfiche WebLink
.......... <br />lolling File 11754 <br />^ July 15, 1992 <br />Pnge 2 <br />filed the variance application as soon as the updated survey was <br />coBplated. <br />The deck slightly encroaches the average lakeshore setback line. <br />Mote Mr. Nenth, the neighbor most impacted by the encroachment, has <br />aubedtted a letter reaffirming his support of Mr. Bullock's variance <br />xeguest* Mote also that at the east lot line the deck is located 9 <br />instead of the required 10*. <br />Please review Exhibit E. Applicant has provided the original <br />raal estate listing information that shows the portion of the second <br />lavel deck that was recently reconstructed. The inspectors have <br />confirmed that the deck was not expanded. <br />Inrdsliip 8tst <br />r f <br />Please review Exhibit A. As Mr. Bullock ’s statement notes the <br />shape of the lots and the fact that all lots are located on a curve or <br />cove of the lake a slight encroachment of the average setback line has <br />no real impact on the views of the adjacent residences. <br />fe::- <br />Zesjes for Consideration <br />1. <br />■ ’ <br />liM ...Wa-’'- <br />!%• <br />75-250* setback area consists of 45.6% hardcover. 744 s.f. <br />or 6.7% is landscape area underlain with plastic. Applicant <br />has advised that because of the sloping topography landscape <br />areas unaerlain with plastic have been installed along the <br />sides of the house to prevent drainage problem. <br />2.Are there other areas of non-essential hardcover that can be <br />considered for removal? <br />'■"M.Any recommendation of approval must contain the condition that <br />n^licant obtain a penalty building permit for construction of deck. <br />“■rite'' ^ <br />- •‘■V-, . • <br />y-¥■mmi. <br />¥