My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
07-27-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2024 1:04:09 PM
Creation date
4/5/2024 1:01:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
^ 'is! “ . <br />4‘ <br />‘ip <br />i;.- <br />*.r-- <br />tf-t <br />•^ n- ■ttJIs-:- <br />fii'' ■ .. . <br />iSt <br />m: <br />%■ <br />Iflm <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JULY 27, 1992 <br />ORDINANCE #105, SECOND SERIES - CONT. <br />Gaffron noted the Inspector has not yet added soil borings to his <br />normal maintenance procedure, although that will likely occur in <br />the future due to the shoreland requirements. <br />Callahan added that the base areas of the project are In serious <br />need of ♦‘he sewer and should have to connect immediately. He felt <br />that the deadline date was extended to allow those in other areas, <br />such as Cygnet Place and Leaf Street with an acceptable system, <br />additional time to connect. <br />Qoetten agreed with Callahan. She thought the number of residents <br />allowed the full five year time period would be very small. <br />Jabbour stated he felt that those with a working system, should be <br />allowed the additional time. He said with the restrictions so <br />severe now, almost all systems would be found non-conforming. <br />Moorse remembered a number of residents at the public hearing <br />concerned about the criteria used by staff for conformance. <br />Jabbour felt that part of the negotiation with the residents was <br />a compromise on the connection deadline date. He felt the Council <br />should adhere to their original decision. <br />Butler thought the Intent was to change the current ordinance to <br />allow 60 months for connection instead of the current 16 months. <br />She said she did not envision a whole new set of regulations. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Ordinance <br />•105, Second Series, extending the time period for hook-up to the <br />new Stubbs Bay sewer system. Ayes 3, nays 0. Callahan abstained. <br />(#13) AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S FEE SCHEDULE CONCERNING THE SEWER <br />SERVICE CHARGE FOR UN-CONNECTED PROPERTIES - <br />ORDINANCE ilOe, SECOND SERIES <br />Moorse explained this is a change m policy allowing the Stubbs Bay <br />area residents up to five years to connect to the sewer if their <br />current septic system is not failing, and waiving the service <br />charge during that interim period. <br />Qoetten asked If Orono s <br />properties during that tim^ <br />billed from the m for those <br />Moorse stated that this is th^ City's billing for sows'* and Orono <br />will not be billed by M.W.C.C. i ■'r the additional prope-'ties until <br />tney connect. <br />1 .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.