Laserfiche WebLink
h*-■ft; <br />' i: • ' <br />...?^'> <br />i <br />ftet Council Rural Area Policy - Data Compilation June 23, 1992 Page 7 <br />%- <br />4.There is capacity in MWCC lines foi the Stubbs Bay <br />Project. <br />5. <br />V" <br />fW ^ <br />Stubbs Bay is existing development which Met Council by <br />past action has allowed to be connected in 4 other <br />Serving Stubbs Bay does not change the MWCC <br />system needs since zoning won't change. This is a <br />planned expansion of laterals to solve existing <br />problems’. <br />li- <br />iW' <br />Since Stubbs Bay is existing density, connecting or not <br />connecting it has no negative impact on our rural <br />density compliance. It actually eliminates one of our <br />most non*~compliant areas. <br />t <br />Minnetonka Bluff/West Perndale/f^orth Shore/Marinas Project <br />eoMMinced Pall 1980, completed ivugv.st 1981, MUSA amended by <br />Resolution No. 1337 in November i981> Crystal Bay Project <br />(OOmsisnced in 1985, completed June 1986, Comprehensive Plan <br />not amended until February 1987. In these two most recent <br />projects, prior MUSA amendment was not required. <br />r, <br />Since the initial position was taken by Barb Senness <br />ceiieerning the approval of the extension of the MUSA to include <br />the Stubbs Bay area, staff has met with Ms. Senness and other Met <br />Council staff to review the Stubbs Bay project and the <br />comprehensive plan approval process. Met Council staff have <br />limdioeted a favorable reaction to the "tubbs Bay project itself, <br />flioy have also indicated the rural developa»nt density issue will <br />not stand in the way of the approval of a comprehensive plan <br />>nt for the Stubbs Bay project. <br />Isv <br />—— <br />y <br />■« <br />a <br />3