My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 10:38:22 AM
Creation date
4/1/2024 10:35:43 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
X* ' ■. »'*lit: <br />'•»;rV -* r' <br />p:'' <br />I ->■ ‘ <br />lujv-:, <br />•Vi; <br />ft.v .' <br />•i:r <br />^1* <br />ilv- . <br />'‘♦•I.'. ■' <br />I? <br />'\ii! <br />jsfi''- <br />••V <br />.m <br />■ ■■ <br />ills <br />* *.;• . <br />iH'j •• y • <br />.W- <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONC COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 8, 1992 <br />:DBG FUNDS - CONT <br />Jabbour felt that since the Council has allocated a portion of the <br />1992 funds to home improvement, they could use that amount for the <br />sewer project. <br />Goetten felt that if there are people in need of the funds for <br />other improvements, they should not be denied. <br />Moorse said that the County is currently accepting appiications for <br />the funds for 1992. <br />Butler noted the sewer wi I I not be ready for connection untiI 1993. <br />Gerhardson Indicated that the City has 1 1/2 years to expend the <br />money. <br />Goetten felt that since the money won’t be needed unti I 1993, they <br />should not use 1992 funds. <br />Jabbour disagreed and felt that the properties on Lake Street and <br />next to the public landing are in great need of the sewer and felt <br />that the City should encourage immediate hookup. <br />Gerhardson reported that the 1993 funds will be available as of <br />July 1993. <br />Jabbour withdrew his objection. <br />All Members agreed that they would not use the 1992 CDBG funds for <br />the Stubbs Bay Sewer service connection costs. <br />(#15) AWARD OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY EQUIPMENT <br />Moorse explained that the hoist is the number one priority to award <br />as It needs to bo Installed early In the project. He <br />there are Items In the service equipment section that shouId be <br />Installed within the early portion of the project. He stated they <br />would continue to review the fuel distribution system, and the <br />overhead cranes do not fit into the budget. <br />Jabbour asked If the amount listed for the fuel distribution system <br />was correct. <br />Moorse stated that is the bid price, which also included a number <br />of other I terns. <br />■ ■ I- <br />; -r
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.