My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 10:38:22 AM
Creation date
4/1/2024 10:35:43 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
>1 \I <br />. 4* <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 8, 1992 <br />PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT <br />Gerhardson noted they do not have to have a pubiic hearing for the <br />project, and suggested a public meeting instead. He indicated that <br />the road could be staked to allow the residents to visualize the <br />affect on their properties. <br />Jabbour asked what the City’s chances were for tne variance <br />request. <br />Cook felt that they had a 90% chance of approval. He noted that <br />current City standards require a rural roadway to be paved at a 24 <br />width with 3’ shoulders, or a paved area of 28’ with curb and <br />gutter. He noted the disadvantage of Leaf Street is that it is so <br />straight. <br />Goetten asked the speed Iimit of the road. <br />Gerhardson said it is 30 MPH. <br />Jabbour asked when the road is reconstructed. if it has to follow <br />current standards. <br />Co.-'k reported that the City allows replacement in kind. <br />Jabbour suggested staking the str#»et at the minimum the City would <br />allow and the width of a MSA roao. <br />Goetten suggested that the Police Department patrol the area more <br />Pat Crane stated he signed the petition based on information that <br />ha was unsure about, but through the discussion his questions have <br />been answered. He felt the difference in the paved area was <br />insignificant and stated he would rather save the money on the <br />assessment. <br />C.C. Graham, 95 Leaf Street, felt that the widening of <br />would change the character of the area. She requested <br />Council approach this issue with great caution. <br />the road <br />that the <br />Brian Ehalt, 140 Leaf Street, noted he has small children, but does <br />not allow them to ride on the road currently. He noted the <br />(jlff^fence between a 28’ road and a 32’ road may destroy pine trees <br />on his property. <br />Behrman asked why Leaf Street was the only street singled out. <br />^ -- --
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.