Laserfiche WebLink
H ■ <br />b) The unique shape of the lot requires the placement of <br />the pool and patio area within the wider mid-sections <br />of the property. <br />c) There is approximately 6,900 s.f. of area within the <br />500-1,000' setback area of the property where no <br />hardcover exists but because of the limited 50' width, <br />the improvements could not be located in that portion <br />of the property. <br />4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br />other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br />variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br />light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br />a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br />preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br />would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br />Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use <br />permit to allow the installation of an inground pool and <br />patio area will not be detrimental to the health, safety or <br />general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect <br />light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding <br />property values and that the proposed level of use of the <br />property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives <br />of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />6. The City Council has considered this application including <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br />reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the <br />effect of the proposed variance and conditional use permit <br />on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 5