My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
06-08-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 11:30:42 AM
Creation date
3/29/2024 11:27:12 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />C.The hardship to the property lies in its extreme <br />narrowness at the point where the defined lot <br />width is measured. Furthermore, there is no <br />adjacent land available for purchase that would <br />increase the defined lot width to the 200' minimum <br />standard. <br />The Hennepin County Department of Public Works has <br />verified that the County will approve a private <br />driveway access onto County Road 15. <br />Although the property contains a feasible building <br />site, that site is limited by narrowness of the lot and <br />by the designated drainfield sites, hence careful site <br />planning will be required in developing the property. <br />Therefore, it is appropriate that a diagram of the <br />building envelope and drainfield sites be filed with <br />this resolution to make future potential buyers of the <br />property aware of the site limitations. (Refer to Page <br />6 of this resolution.) <br />The City Council originally granted this variance in <br />1989 per Resolution No. 2650 and in 1990 per Resolution <br />No. 2829 and finds no changes from the original <br />findings of that resolution. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br />this property are peculiar to it and do not apply <br />generally to other property in this zoning district; <br />that granting the variance would not adversely affect <br />traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard <br />or other danger to neighboring property; would not <br />merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or <br />difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br />and Comprchensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application <br />including the findings and recommendations of the <br />Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br />the applicant and the effect of the variances on the <br />health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.