05-11-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'■V • ^ iM: I ‘ 'V^W^v: P -••'Si:-' r.v^’,-'^: ■ ■ - •"‘:f 4;fc. ■C^iP- -r "■ =r'- #«, ■■'V*:‘ Zoning File #1698 May 5, 1992 Page 3 during the summer months. Although applicant's addendum. Exhibit D-2, suggests credit for 570 s.f. of grassed area, in reality there is only 240 s.f. of grassed area within the subject property. Review Exhibit M. The lot line has been shown as it intersects the County road at the shared curb cut to both residential properties. As with all the after-the-fact reviews, the staff is asked to comment as to how we disco /ered the i legal construction. In this case, the Building Inspection Department was asked to comment on the lakeside construction by a nearby property owner who was also dealing with similar lakeshore issues. In the review of the files, the Inspector noted no official approvals for construction of the roofed/screened porch nor of an intermediate deck constructed prior to the roofing of the structure. Hardship Stateaent Review Exhibit D-1. Applicant notes thi following: "My hardship is in being asked to remove something that has existed and I have used for 15 years." Planning Comaission Reccxnmendation The Planning Commission recommended denial of the after-the- fact variance application for a screened/roofed porch constructed at the lakeside of the residence located at 1442 Shoreline Drive And further directed that the unimproved addition be removed by July 1, 1992 and that steps be allowed to be installed within the lakeshore yard providing legal access from the approved 1976 addition. Options of Action Adopt denial recommendation of the Planning Commission as presented, OR Approval as proposed by applicant in amended proposal submitted for April meeting. OR Approval subject to additional removed. s.f. of hardcover being Council Acti< To provide staff with conceptual direction so that appropriate resolution can be presented for Council action at their May 26, 1992 meeting. Isv