Laserfiche WebLink
V-, • « <br />t ^ ' <br />MINUTES OF ORONO 1992 BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 29, 1992 <br />Jabbour asked If the damage to the property <br />appraisal. <br />was done post <br />Anderson noted the appraisal stated the valuation is based upon the <br />Improvements being completed. <br />Erickson stated they would review the property. <br />mm. <br />Don Chase. 365 North Ferndale Road. PID» 36-118-23 41 0002. stated <br />the 1992 valuation is $156,400 and felt It should be $140,000 as <br />that Is what a neighboring property recently sold for after being <br />on the market for 2 1/2 years. He noted that since 1989 his <br />valuation has increased over 20%, <br />Erickson stated they would review the property. <br />imz¥m& <br />Greg Ehalt. 3465 Watertown Road. PIP# 32-118-23 43 0008, noted the <br />1992 valuation is $103,000 and felt that it should be $85,000. He <br />indicated the assessor has reviewed the property and revised the <br />valuation to $95,300, but still felt this was too high. He noted <br />he purchased the property in December of 1991 for $72,500 and has <br />approximately $5,000 in repairs to the property. He submitted <br />letter listing reasons <br />*m <br />why he felt the valuation should be <br />lowered. <br />Cliff Otten. 3800 Wavzata Bouleva'd. PID» 29-118-23 34 0009, said <br />the 1992 valuation Is $88,600 and felt it should be $65,000 based <br />upon what he purchased the property for less than a year ago. <br />2251 Pine Ridge Lane. PIP# 34-118-23 22 0017 - Otten stated that <br />the 1992 valuation is $137,900. He statea this property is rented <br />and produces income based on a value less than the market value. <br />He paid $100,000 a few years ago. He felt it should be reduced to <br />$114,000 as It ‘--as last year. <br />Jabbour asked if the valuation is based on the income stream. <br />Yf •• <br />a.Erickson noted it Is not typical In Orono for a single family <br />residence to be rented. <br />m <br />m. <br />I f •• <br />otten noted the City currently has a munIcipa I well on part of the <br />property. <br />r ■ <br />• .