04-27-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

■M ■'Z-'i II i II I -s; l^i,?.'! '■:• .;F^#l*£e .Water Structures Committee 'll- ■. -.w;: m*: i-:- ■ :-V, V , - ^mi-- V m • vv; ®K:' atm.:-.- ii; SMM-% !«»«« ■&: : 'feck- $^kw.>y Sc : ' ■'?c rsr:4. : ■; ■' ‘S?»h •■; ■ ■ .,v4' - tiy^ \. m-.- ’ .m- ■.; '*.*■ ->5. V. . i-- ^U:r>.y . ,-■my cC' V- V . • ' .?!• *.• ' !*- •. *» • April 11, 1992Babcock pointed out that the Association is licensed for a grandfathered, non-conforming multiple dock. The LMCD Code does no. allow an increase in slip size without losing the grandfathered status through a new dock license application. The in creases in slip sizes proposed by the Association are not minor in nature. Should the Association pursue the change it would have to apply for a new multiple dock license. It would have to comply with the current Code which would allow four restricted watercraft at this site, based on 22C ’ of shoreline. Greg Keller, attorney for the Forest Arms Improvement Asso- member of the association, spoke in Keller e.xpressed his opinion that the more than a method of determining the fee to be charged. He believes it has an effect on the density on Lake Minnetonka. In the proposed plan the number of WSUs is reduced and therefore an asset to the Lake. Babcock presented a proposal for a minor change taking into consideration the 220’ of shoreline, for the 14 slips with 20’ ciation and Sue Dorgoske, favor of the application. Watercraft Storage Unit is side set backs. He proposed 5 @ 12’ .x 32 10’ X 16* all opening toward the Lake. Adams do not want to give up any claim for the 24 sponded that the LMCD does not license WSUs, configuration and slip size. Dongoske noted they decrease the size of 10 slips for an increase in (» 10’ X 24’ and 4 @ responded that they WSUs. Babcock re- the license is for are offering to 4. f ■ y ■ m'y r'- Adams said they appreciate the suggestion Babcock made, but it is important to them to keep the 24 WSUs. There was a discussion of the dock cc.ifiguration. Questions were raised about the location of the various finger lengths and how the slip size would be measured if a 16’ were next to a 24'. Babcock said the actual layout of the dock will have to be worked out with staff. MOTION: Rascop moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend approval of a minor change in configuration for Forest Arms Improvement Association, moving the four slips on the walkway to the main dock with the slip sizes to remain as shown on the original license, stressing there is to be no increase iri slip size, details to be worked out with staff according to the dis cussion. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 5.B.I. Bean’s Greenwood Marina Multiple Dock License Renewal Application. The committee received a report from Thibault reviewing the status of the Marina. Attached were drawings showing the 1986 status and a current configuration. The report recommends slips 80-82 be maintained at 12’ x 32’, with slip 79 relocated to its former position next to #80. The other five slips involved may be relocated within the 100’ zone at the owner’s discretion. Thibault p|‘esented an overhead view of the marina. There was discussion with James Bean, owner, as to the configuration discrepancies. ' Bean said he disagrees with the 12’ x 32’ size for slip #82 which extends beyond 100’. Bean contends he had administrative permission in 1985 to move slip #79 to slip #S2’s location. Increasing the size of #82 to 40*.