My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
04-13-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2024 10:27:16 AM
Creation date
3/12/2024 10:23:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i.: •' • I.^ <br />’/ • •■ <br />5'.-; <br />it <br />fe. <br />* ^ ^4 * ** ^.• r •• kSJ? <br />,'l <br />•ii <br />K^7- <br />■ -iC' .' • <br />L‘ •■ <br />•'•C *.^ . • -- • <br />-. <br />(L:-*i ■'■ ' <br />ly- ■•'■ <br />'•Ll'" <br />aT ^ <br />?-■;• <br />W ' <br />i':.-■.' <br />w*A/- <br />•v^] <br />V ■ ^ <br />" ri <br />•v;.41 <br />i-fe?. <br />01^0^ <br />itv of 0R0>’0 <br />ESO’-'JTION OF The CITY COUNCIL <br />NO 526 <br />5. On August 15, 1908 and October 3, 1980, the Orono Planning <br />CommlBsion reviewed the application as proposed and reconmeuded <br />unanimous approval of the application based on the following findings: <br />A) The current proposal will have no negative impact on <br />surrouding wetlands or intersecting drainageway. <br />the <br />B) Once again, the adjacent property owners have been advised of <br />the applicant's proposal and none have voiced objection or <br />submitted written opposition to the City. <br />C) The application as modified by the Planning Commission will <br />not be detrimental to the public heilt.h, safety or welfare or <br />materially injurious to properties or improvements in the <br />vacinity . <br />D) Braun Engineering, in a letter dated May 28, 1987, has opined <br />as follows regarding the placement of approximately 100,000 cubic <br />yards of fill over a former dump site: <br />“. . .it is our opinion that the addition of 5' of fill over <br />the area presents a very slight risk of embankment failure." <br />6. The City Council has considered this renewal application including <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commiaaion, leporta <br />by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br />use on the .health, safety and welfare of rhp community. <br />7. The City Council finds that granting a renewal conditional use <br />permit to allow ..he filling of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill <br />within the area as defined by the Orono staff, will not be detrimental <br />to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not <br />adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property <br />values and that the proposed level of use of the property will bo In <br />keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDEB AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City <br />Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code <br />Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 ft 20 to permit the placing of 100,000 cubic <br />yards of fill within an area approved by the Orono staff, subject to the <br />following conditions: <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />o.i. e . . <br />■r.- ;.1 <br />. • • wAs,\ <br />e , V ^ <br />V.-W <br />A’ ^ <br />• '<ri <br />&i <br />> ? ■ ^ <br />■ f -i; <br />.-.V ..A L:‘if <br />mm <br />> V V' - : J3 <br />nm <br />• A-»,^ <br />*'Y . > <- l <br />4^ ,V <br />‘i <br />w <br />VV* * <br />V r:. <br />i'<h
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.