Laserfiche WebLink
p: ■ ■H: :/ <br />»''’ . <br />‘ . y' •m <br />•-" .'ittSF--fi"'•V- <br />> > <br />'llis <br />tviSisf <br />h^-.'^j:- <br />m'v <br />;*/■ <br />w <br />iiili.5t <br />my% <br />‘.I ': <br />'Sit. <br />■,iV'*i,y.; <br />SCK- <br />t '■ ^ <br />life <br />'v:-^ '^i <br />Mr- <br />M^‘m-.-pi--- <br />■ir <br />lfSv..,!yiv'- ■'■ <br />im^-' <br />Iv^"'m <br />Zoning File #1717 March 9, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Isv <br />P%': "■ . ,- ' %v’ ■ <br />Shall hardcover be maintained at a specific percentage or <br />level on this property? Is 32.1 acceptable when existing <br />was at 29.5? <br />Are the hardships acceptable? <br />Would we create an unsafe condition by reducing hardcover <br />along the west sides of the paved area? (Should a minimum <br />of 90 s.f. of existing paved hardcover be removed to match <br />the proposed 90 s.f. along the east side, maintaining a <br />total hardcover increase of 2.3% with total hardcover at <br />31.8% within 75-250' setback area?) <br />Other issues raised by the Planning Commission.