My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
03-23-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2024 9:19:43 AM
Creation date
3/11/2024 9:16:21 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 • <br /># <br />I-f <br />^1:?; <br />'5hA'‘ <br />m <br />■lilt <br />'■f^. ■> <br />vi*' <br />I*# <br />& <br />ii’ <br />♦ft;-- ,•>» <br />,# i <br />0 <br />te‘ <br />IPm <br />V'*\M:1.-^* <br />m <br />01>'14/89 01:07 421 0121 POCTPCNICS INC crAGE 02 <br />standards for such wells, new water sources shall be identified and provided for <br />such person, at the expense of the permittee. The cost of any expert witness fees <br />required to prove such contamination shall be paid by the permittee, if the ultimate <br />determination is that the well has been contaminated by the project. <br />9. Transportation Standards. Article V, Section B of the Draft Permit shall be <br />changed to read as follows: Standards shall be set prior to the installarion of any <br />TAP for transportation of all ash and/or TAP from any incinerator and from any <br />storage site to or from the pilot plant in Georgia and to any future treatment plant, <br />including complete containment of all such ash and extreme caution in transferring <br />the same from trucks to storage facilities at such treatment plants. Procediu-es shall <br />be devised to be followed by driver n the case of any accident or spillage, and each <br />driver shall be trained in such procedures. The Minnesota PCA, USPCI, and the <br />Citizens Review Board shall be notified of any such incidents within 48 hours of <br />their occurrence. <br />10. Removal Plan. A plan shall be formulated prior to the installation of any <br />TAP which will provide for a fast, complete, and effective removal of all TAP from <br />the test site in the event the testing provides information that the presence of the <br />TAP is hazardous, and standards shall be set for identification of interim test results <br />which would require the immeoiate removal of the TAP from the roadway. The <br />Plan shall provide for removal of contaminants from surrounding waterways, soil, <br />buildings, agricultural products, and aquifers, and shall be coordinated with the <br />safety procedures to be utilized by any employees handling the TAP. <br />11. Ultimate Disposal or Recycling. There shall be Incorporated into the Qosure <br />Plan, Item X, page 12 of the Draft Permit, a Plan for ultimate disposal or recycling, <br />which plan shall be formulated before the TAP has been applied for the ultimate <br />disposal of the TAP, at such time as the road has deteriorated, which include specific <br />proposals for removal, recycling, tracking of hazardous materials, and ultimate <br />procedures for safe landfilling of any hazardous or nonrecydable material. Any <br />material that exhibits characteristics of a hazardous waste shall be disposed of in a <br />manner appropriate for hazardous waste The locations of such facilities, and the <br />total costs of such hazardous waste disposal and handling, shall be part of the Plan. <br />Unless a significant portion of the TAP can be recycled and the ultimate volume and <br />toxicity of material to be deposited In landfills will be less than it would have been <br />had the ash not been incorporated into the TAP, no TAP shall be installed. <br />12. Moratorium. There shall be a moratorium on plant siting, on any further <br />consideration of applications for permits, and on environmental impact studies or <br />statements until all tests described In the permit are completed and fully analyzed. <br />No large expendihires should be made and no permit application shall be accepted <br />by the MPCA until a determination is made that the utilization of TAP for roadway <br />asphalt is safe and economically feasible, so thit the argument cannot later be made <br />that because a great deal of money has already been spent, a bad project should be <br />completed to avoid waste. <br />1 <br />h
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.