Laserfiche WebLink
S 12 Passes 73-18 <br />RUT AITFRNME MEASURE lANDS 35 mS <br />By JEANNINE AVERSA <br />H H H ASHINGTON — <br />B V The cable industry <br />BsBB suffered a blow Iasi <br />■■ Friday morning <br />Bi when the Senate <br />nissed S 12 in a 73-18 vote and re- <br />tccted a less onerous, stripped- <br />down alternative bill. <br />In the end, the Senate adopted <br />more than a dozen new amend ­ <br />ments to S 12. but key provisions <br />in the bill, notably those covering <br />ate regulation, program access and <br />Mti-discrimination, and rctransmis- <br />Hon consent remained intact. <br />A less onerous alternative <br />pockage that was being peddled by <br />the cable industry, a coalition of <br />Democrats and Republicans and <br />IJk Bush administration was reject­ <br />ed by the Senate in a 35-54 vote. <br />Broadcasters were rejoicing <br />over their self-proclaimed victory, <br />while cable executives chose to fo­ <br />cus instead on the silver lining they <br />■aw in the 35 vole.s the alternative <br />mea.sure attracted. <br />Those 35 volc.s, they concurred, <br />dgnal that lawmakers in the House <br />may be willing to consider a more <br />moderate approach to cable re-reg­ <br />ulation. <br />But some cable executives <br />pointed fingers of blame, noting <br />IS a ,Ver <br />0 <br />i I <br />r ' -M-v <br />' I • f k . * s' <br />that many key M.SO executives <br />were not on the scene doing what <br />they could to drum up more sup­ <br />port for the allemalivc measure <br />“For the majority of the M.SO <br />executives to be on a boat in the <br />Caribbean jon Home Box Office’s <br />annual junket), shows y«’u how fat <br />this industry has become,” said <br />one MSO executive who did not <br />want to be identified <br />Fingers of blame aside, industry <br />executives agreed that although ca ­ <br />ble had not defeated .S 12. it had <br />gained ground in the battle. <br />"The strength of the substitute <br />means that our mission was ac ­ <br />complished and that we shall live <br />to fight another day.” said James <br />Mooney, president of the National <br />Cable Television As.sociation. <br />Moonev said that while it was <br />unfortunate that the .Senate passed <br />such an “extreme bill," which he <br />called a "strange vision of con­ <br />sumer protection.” he was more <br />than plea.scd by the .strength of the <br />votes for the substitute — 37 by <br />the N(TA s head count. <br />(Althcnigh 37 senators voted for <br />the substitute, two votes were n<’t <br />counted in the final tallv because <br />they were paired with ottiei .alrscnt <br />senators who voted no.) <br />“This thing has a long way yet <br />to go, including a potential veto, <br />and it’s up to us to redouble our ef- <br />Rate Rebate Bill Will Resurface <br />we* -r <br />^ H ■ ASHINGTON — A provision that would allow <br />■lu (he Federal Communicatioitt Cotninission to order <br />mm refunds to cable subscribers of overcharges when <br />rates are deemed “unreasonable ” by the agency will be in­ <br />cluded in a bill to reauthorize the PCC. • •• * <br />Sen. Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio) prepared to offer <br />sudi an ameodnicnt to cable bill S 12 last Thursday. But <br />Metzenbaum said he withdrew the item after learning that <br />Senate communications subcommittee chairman Daniel !n- <br />ouye (D-Hawaii), who oversees PCC leautborizatiooleg- <br />isiation, will .stick the refund provision into the PCC budget <br />bill. f-. f ■ • <br />Under S 12. the PCC has the authprity to regulate rates <br />beyond the basic service tier only if, after having received <br />a complaint from a subscriber, the agency detenmnes the <br />Tate to be “unreasonable." .. <br />’ The bill leaves it to the PCC to decide what constiunes <br />an unreasonable rate. An FCC budget bill will be offered <br />later tliis year. ■ , 1 ' ‘ ; : <br />forts in the House to sec that the extreme bi <br />does not prevail." Mooney reiterated <br />Cable executives, in general, cchoc <br />Mooney's outUxiV.. Falcon Cable TV chai <br />man Marc Nathanson asserted. "If this b <br />is not changed dramatically m the House . <br />conference committee. White Hou.se sourc <br />have assured me it will definitely be vetoed <br />Nathanson added that "the Bush admini <br />iralion, and I say this to you as a Demoer: <br />understands the shallowness of this bill ai <br />liiat it is not a con.sumer bill." <br />John Hendricks, chairman of The Disco <br />erv Channel, noted that S 12 came out <br />committee w ith a 16-3 vote But of those <br />senators, just 12 voted in favor of S 12' <br />the floor Hendricks said that indicates th <br />cable lobbyists have built at least some m <br />mentum <br />Many cable executives said that if S <br />were to become law. new cable prograi <br />ming services would be its first victi: <br />"Revenues that otherwise would be spent <br />cable programming and customer servi <br />[ improvcmenia instead would be expend <br />on broadcast retransmission fees and reg <br />latory proceedings. ” said Robert Sachs, s <br />nior vice president of corporate and legal. <br />fairs for Continental Cablevision. <br />Meanwhile. Wall Street analysts were i <br />pushing the panic button over the passage <br />S 12. "Thirtv-five votes means that the c <br />0 <br />jcctivc was met, will signal to the Wh <br />House that a veto of any bill rcsemblinj: <br />12 could be (sustained)/' said Bear. Stei <br />tt Co analyst Ken Goldman “Any ultim. <br />hill that gets enacted into law this year <br />probably going to be a compromise.'" <br />Rut Bob Schmidt, president of the Wir <br />less Cable Association, w as not reading <br />much into the tea leaves The 35 vole <br />Schmid! says, are not cnocai to the real, fii <br />issues 'I don't believe ilieir srrategy to b <br />'^ter a \'*'hiie Hou^ that has thiratencd a vi <br />of this IcLislatmn iropresse*' me. bccau<^ <br />thinV *iu3fe 204! ov '-r realise thr <br />mils a cnnMjm''r issue ’*