02-10-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ..i.- -->‘4 .'- •'- "* '(V ; :', -• V ':*•, ■ ■-7- ■ ■ ■«r-. *t • J%«•m ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING FILE #1470-KNAPP CONTINUED Cohen preferred to see a stri MEETING OCTOBER 15, 1990 •INUED v.oneu t»i.ci.ci.j.^d to see a straight subdivision. Kelley said, "I believe that a PRD is suitable. This unlgue parcel because of the land characteristics." -—..-.a *..3 proposed cul-de-sac and private driveway Knapp asked how many driveways can acces?? off is a of a cul-de-sac. Kelley replied, "There is really other safety and lot width standards ar Mr. Knapp suggested that the thr directly from the cul-de-sac. access off Ly no limitation as long as are met." three driveways could access xxwiii uii»= . Hanson asked Mr. Knapp if he had explored the possibility of acquiring additional land. Mr. Knapp replied, "The Nature Conservancy is to the west, the property to the east is wetland. I have talked with Mr. White regarding the road. I had suggested a more direct approach to the cul-de-sac. Mr. vmite indicated that he has no plans to further develop his property and that my su- - devalue his property." •re direct approach le has no plans to suggestions would axue nxa pxw^^rty. Kelley believed thc-t the present proposal, one driveway off the cul-de-sac, made more sense from a planning point of view. Mr. Knapp said, "I am trying very hard to minimize any :t to the trees. The trees are the value and beauty of the *rty. I ..urchased the property with the intent to construct irae for ‘myself. However, it is an expensive piece of »rty. I am not a developer, but I do intend to establish limitations that will protect the land and trees as much as 9 Tie uiyoexi. • cty. I am not limitations that- -^- - - - - ble." was moved by Kelley, seconded by Hanson, to recommend L of the proposed three-lot PRD with a single driveway from the cul-de-sac. The driveway shall form a "T" to ^ne lot to the east and two lots to the north. The p for this configuration is the inability to locate the sac further east due to the topography. It is further nded that an easement be provided for access to the Nature ancy, and that Oiitlot D not continue west or north, sked if the loo^was acceptable in lieu of a cul-de-sac. ling Commission agreed a loop is acceptable. Motion, ays-0. Motion carried. Nature inue west or north, lieu of a cul-de-sac. acceptable. Motion, - 3 -