Laserfiche WebLink
(i. <br />Zoning File #1706 <br />January 15, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />building pads/lots (specifically on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, <br />Block 2). Outlot D is classified as a private driveway and the <br />code has no specific setback standards for structures adjacent to <br />driveways. The City will ask that the 5r* setback for all <br />construction be n ’.ntained from Outlot D. <br />As all pads/lots appear to be over 1.99 acres, are lot <br />coverage constraints necessary? Applicant has noted^ at an <br />earlier meeting that these covenants will .ittempt to minimi <br />tree removal and disturbance of the steeper sloped areas. Revie/ <br />Exhibit H, the map that designates the areas in excess of 1C% <br />slope. Should we restrict construction within these areas? If <br />so, consider the impact on Lot 1, Block 1 - would you allow <br />accessory structures to be constructed in front of the front line <br />of the principal structure on Lot 1, Block 1? This would <br />prohibit all additions to the west, north and east side of the <br />existing structure. Certainly the open space ar.--as (Outlets A <br />and B) can be prohibited from any improvements involving land <br />alterations. If prohibiting construction within areas in excess <br />of 18% slopes is too restrictive, what other methods or controls <br />are realistic? <br />In your approval recommendation the following items should be <br />addressed: <br />1. Speci'^1 setbacks. <br />2. Restrictions on tree removal and land alterations within <br />steep sloped areas. <br />Options: <br />A. Prohibit all land alterations/construction within areas <br />found to be in excess of 18% slope. <br />B. Create additional buffer areas within each building pad <br />similar to Suaar Woods. <br />C. Hardcover cont 'Is. <br />D. Others deemed appropriate by Planning Commission. <br />3. Reg* re open space easement over Outlets A and B. Easement <br />to include future access drive to Nature Conservancy <br />property. <br />4. The staking of alternate jt:.c site within Lot 1, Block ^ <br />and primary and alternate site in Lot 1, Block 2 prior to <br />private road and private drive construction. <br />5. Because of special topographic constraints on Lot 1, Block 1 <br />and Lot 1, Block 2, would Planning Commission conside- <br />allowing accessory structures to be cc"structed in front of <br />the front line of the principal structures? <br />6. Applicant to confirm that easement serving property to <br />immediate eas' is located within private driveway outlot, <br />Outlot D.