Laserfiche WebLink
t: <br />f <br />: ■ <br />i <br />-i. <br />Matar Structures and Environment Committee January 11, 1992 <br />Cochran commented that the Ordinance is a prohibition <br />against construction of- new multiple docks and commercial docks. <br />He does not have a teelino about expansion of the commercial <br />docks. The multiple docks are of two kinds; one kind consisting <br />of residents who combined docks during low water. That is not an <br />increase in boat storage. The real issue is * new real estate <br />development and outlets. This is a potential problem for in <br />creased density that still exists, <br />There was a discussion of the i boat per 50 rule and the <br />effect of wetlands in measuring the shoreland to be used. <br />Rascop moved. Cochran seconded, to direct staff to draw up <br />an ordinance to exclude wetlands from shoreline fo«- determining <br />1 — 50* boat storage calculations. The motion was withdrawn. <br />Reese moved. Hurr seconded, to extend the moratorium for one <br />to allow further Management Plan implementa- <br />tion St^ies^ asked about appl icat iorts from marinas for minor <br />Changes in configuration, and applications from the illegal <br />multiple docks observed on the boat count. <br />Qrathwol responded if they existed before the moratorium <br />-there is no problem. iniii-jnoThe motion was amended by adding: ....with the following <br />1) Allow consideration of applications for configuration <br />changes to existing marinas. ^,^1, <br />2) Allow now dock licence application if multiple dock <br />existed, according to LMCO records, before the moratorium was <br />RSMOP Mved, Cochran seconded to recommend staff <br />tion of a feasibility study as to the ramifications of excluding <br />Mtland from the multiple dock license and boat storage require­ <br />ments. Motion carried. ^ <br />Rascop mowed, Cochran seconded, to recommend . <br />a sub-committee of the fourteen cities, with the LMCD a^ <br />facilitors, to discuss drafting an ordinance to control outlets <br />with respect to boat density and storage. <br />The motion carried, 5 ayes and 4 nays. Rascop, Cochran, <br />Penn, Pillsbury and Qrathwol voted aye. <br />Agenda Modification: Cochran proceeded to IT7. <br />7 Prnnnsed DNR Access at Maxwell Bay <br />the access study lies with the LMCD. <br />Penn «a, excused.^ dated 1/9/9Z. Gordon Ki.ball. ONR Regional <br />Trails and Waterways Supervisor, presented a proposal con o g <br />of three parts: - continued