Laserfiche WebLink
(1) Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; <br /> (2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the water body; <br /> (3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary <br />high water level averages 30 percent or greater; and <br /> (4)The slope must drain toward the water body. <br /> <br />Bluff impact zone means a bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff. <br />Bluff, toe of the , means the lower point of the lowest 50-foot segment with an average slope <br />exceeding 18 percent. If the lowest such point is lakeward of the OHWL, the OHWL will be <br />defined as the toe. <br />Bluff, top of the , means that point on the cross section of a bluff below which the slope becomes <br />more than 18 percent and above which the average slope for a distance of 50 feet or more is 18 <br />percent or less. <br />Additionally, Section 78-1279 requires a 30-foot setback for any structure or building from the top <br />of bluff. <br /> <br />The subject property contains a bluff, which was verified and depicted by a licensed surveyor. The <br />city requires a 30-foot setback from the top of bluff where no building or structure can be located. <br />This includes retaining walls, driveways, etc. Minimal grading is permitted within the bluff <br />setback, but not within the bluff impact zone. The bluff impact zone, which is defined as 20-feet <br />from the top of bluff, prohibits buildings or structure and grading. The proposal includes grading <br />within the bluff impact zone and new structures within the bluff setback that staff cannot support. <br />5.Planning Commission Vote and Comment: <br />On January 16, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The original proposal <br />included a patio and a small portion of the home within the bluff setback. The Planning <br />Commission provided feedback in support of the requested variances for average lakeshore <br />setback and the bluff setbacks for necessary grading and the driveway. The Planning Commission <br />was clear to state that they did not support a patio or any part of the home within the required bluff <br />setbacks. The Planning Commission ultimately denied the application as applied by a vote of 3 to <br />1. The applicant has removed the patio within the bluff setback, pulled the home building footprint <br />out of the bluff setback, and decreased the amount of grading within the bluff. However, the <br />applicant is still proposing retaining walls and grading around the home because of the walk out <br />basement design and lakeside path. The plan requires variances for the average lakeshore setback <br />encroachments and encroachments into the bluff setback and bluff impact zone including the new <br />driveway, retaining walls, grading, and lakeside path, which are highlighted in Exhibit F - Bluff <br />Encroachments. Draft minutes from the Planning Commission are included as Exhibit C. <br /> <br />A link to the January 16th Planning Commission packet for this item is included for your <br />reference. <br />6.Public Comment: <br />The applicant has provided letters of support from the neighbors at 4415 and 4425 North Shore <br />Drive. The support of the neighbors was given for the original design. No other public comments <br />have been received. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />123