Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File i^^lSOl <br />February 9, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />4. Total building height of Lot 5 is 34’10" as measured from the highest existing <br />elevation 939.1’ grade. This height is consistent around all elevations of the <br />proposed buiL ing. Whereas house on LcU 6 measures 30 ’ from the street side <br />and 39’ to the rear. House on Lot 4 measures 30 ’ from the street yard and 41’ <br />from rear yard. <br />5. Applicant notes house on Lot 5 will actually be 6’ lower than the adjacent <br />residences. <br />6. A classic 2 1/2 story colonial with mansard roof and as further described in <br />hardship #4 could not be built based on the limitations of the building height <br />section and could only be installed with a walkout design which applicant claims <br />is not really suited for the traditional colonial style. <br />Please note all propenies within the City are subject to the height regulations - not just <br />lakcshore. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. <br />3. <br />4. <br />What hardships are valid in the variance request? What findings are valid in the <br />variance request? <br />What was the intent of the building height code amendment? <br />What is your response when applicant ’s consultant claims this specific design o', <br />home cannot be built in the City because of the approval method of determining <br />allowed height of structure. <br />What will be .the real impact of this structu on the immediate neighborhood? <br />Does the area of the lot. proposed setbacks, the unique physical feanire or <br />adjacent land uses have any bearing in your determination?