Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1874 <br />October 14, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />4 Should storage modules be placed over landscape areas designated on the site <br />plan, thereby reducing hardcover.^ Or should they be placed in designated <br />parking spaces, thereby reducing the already limited parking (a variance has <br />already been granted to allow 42 spaces instead of the required 48) ’ <br />5 If parking spaces are reduced, how will applicant deal with overllow parking? <br />6. Is the need for storage seasonal, and would it be feasible to have the storage <br />modules removed from the site during some seasoms;' <br />7. How will the storage mtxiules be screened from public view. i.e. from the lake <br />and from the road? Will they be in character with the club house building? <br />8. In general terms, how does the Planning Commission Itel about an increase of <br />structural hardcover in the 0-75' zone on this limited site? <br />9. The DNR has been notified of this application (required by the Shoreland <br />Regulations) and has recommended denial ot any kKation in the 0-75 zone, but <br />would not object to them over existing hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Commission is requested to determine if a suitable hardship exists and <br />recommend whether storage modules should be allowed to be placed on the property; if so. <br />where should they be located; how they should be screened; if parking spaces are eliminated, <br />how parking will be dealt with, whether hardcover tradeoffs are needed or advisable, and <br />address other pertinent issues