My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
12-13-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2024 4:13:57 PM
Creation date
1/26/2024 4:10:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator <br />December 3. 1993 <br />#1850 James Spinner, 940 North Arm Drive - Variances <br />\ <br />\«.N <br />V ^ <br />V <br />u <br />Status of Application <br />Per Council ’s directive at the October 25lh meeting, the amended application was <br />presented to the Planning Commission for further consideration and recommendation. The <br />enclosed staff memo reviews the amended hardcover facts per the revised improvement plan. <br />The four member Planning Commission reviewed the amended proposal resulting in the <br />removal of an additional 250 s.f. of paved area to the lakeside of the proposed garage stall <br />Members questioned whether additional non-structural improvements could be removed to the <br />north side of residence consisting of a concrete paved area (0-75 ’ - 55 s.f., 75-250 ’ - 308 s.f.). <br />Mr. Herstein, applicant ’s contractor, noted this would require major land alterations into the <br />steeper slopes and felt that the e.xisting improvement solved the drainage problem on the north <br />side. The Planning Commission was unable to affect any other additional hardcover removals. <br />Planning Conuiiission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission voted to deny the variance application of James Spinner as <br />shown in the recent amended proposal based on the following findings: <br />1. The improvement involved new pennanent structural hardcover within the 0-75 ’ <br />setback area w'here excesses exist and where none is allowed. <br />2. The variance requested and the existing hardcover excesses are extreme. <br />Applicants have presented inadequate concessions to offset these e.xcesses. <br />Council Action <br />To provide staff with cmiceptual direction so that an appropriate resolution can be <br />presented to the Council at their January 10. 1994 meeting.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.