Laserfiche WebLink
in excei^s <br />requesting <br />5 to you. <br />3, INC. <br />TO: <br />I'ROM: <br />aVl ’E: <br />SUBJEa ’: <br />Planning Conmission 5 Council <br />Hank ?luluch, Zoning Administrator <br /># Q O Q <br />Q..J) <br />November 2, 1977 <br />Tlionas Lyon - 4790 North Sliore Diive <br />Variance - Ix>t Area <br />Here we are - back again in the Bergquist 5 Kicklund's Park AdditionI This is <br />the last rcraining site in Block 3, 'Fhe site appears to meet the width require­ <br />ments, but lacks adequate area. <br />The survey suilnnitted with the application appears to have been made some time ago. <br />It notes the markers and dimensions of the subject parcel as platted, but fails <br />to indicate the status of the right of A-;ays as constructed. If tliis right of way <br />area were to l>e deducted, tlie total area would be reduced quite substantially. <br />Although we generally require a current suiv^ey with proposals such as this, I <br />felt it would be too costly to the applicant if the application were denied. If <br />the variance is approved, however, it sliould be contingent upon the applicant <br />providing a current survey to verify data si^nni'^tcd and eliminate tlie guess work. <br />l-finimum lot area requirei:>ent in this district is 43,560 sq. ft. 'Hic area of this <br />lot as shown on the survey is approximtely 22,000 sq. ft. This is questionable, <br />however. That area u|X)n which the right of way exists (as shown on survey) should <br />probably be deducted from the total buildable area. <br />Access to County Road S19 wiild also create a problem. The limited vision around <br />the curve of County Road #19 would only add to tlie current liazardoiis Tiaffic <br />situation along the highway. <br />Unless the owner can provide proof of some safer means of access to the property, <br />I would hesitate recommending approval. Several other properties on this block <br />will be providing access to Tonka V'^iew Lane located north of these properties by <br />obtaining private easements. <br />All setback requirements should also be addressed. Without a survey, the app^.leant <br />was unable to indicate a proposed location from which we could determine if any <br />setback variances might be necessary. <br />PLANNING COMNlISSiaN - November 21, 1977 <br />Mr. § Mrs. Lyon were present. The Planning Comnission tabled the application with <br />conceptual approval of the necessary area and lot width variances subject to the <br />following conditions: <br />(1) applicant provide certified survey of lot with proposed location of structure, <br />(2) No other variances. <br />(3) No access onto County Road #19. <br />(4) Applicant provide evidence of easement or otlier acceptable assurance for safe <br />access to property from Tonka View Lane, <br />Justifications: <br />(1) No additional land available <br />(2) Area is sewered. <br />• « <br />f <br />V. ■ * <br />I <br />'5 <br />TO:Plan] <br />FRai:Hank <br />DATE:Octo <br />SUBJECT:Geor <br />Subc <br />Enclosed is a c <br />of the Kelley i <br />for the ori gin? <br />October 24, 19 <br />This replat co; <br />approved Lot 2 <br />lot line of Lo <br />revision in tli <br />The new plat c <br />1,200 ft. in 1 <br />ment to the ea <br />development fc <br />All three adjs <br />access to Watc <br />de-sac would ] <br />proposed lots <br />Drainage and i <br />Engineer and ! <br />and Public Wo <br />City and desc <br />Copies of the <br />review and cc <br />Attorney, Cit <br />A public heai <br />neeting of Nc <br />planning CC^T' <br />Public Hearii <br />inore time to