Laserfiche WebLink
NC. <br />nformation <br />I am <br />:ceptable <br />L private <br />zest lot <br />ire based <br />t that drains <br />ttals, a <br />sntire length <br />n have been <br />oils typically <br />r tables. In <br />ently ponded, <br />ptic systems. <br />ssified as <br />f 12%. Again, <br />eptic systems, <br />eptic system <br />ing 50% has <br />opes in excess <br />ng 60% has slopes <br />12) 559-3700 <br />1-8029 <br />)) 532-5820 <br />K <br />k. <br />-ft <br />.1 <br />N <br />I <br />I <br />if <br />i^i <br />Hank Muhich <br />November 28, <br />Page Two <br />1977 <br />JJ.O’li <br />Lot 4: 40% Hamel soils and 35% has slopes in excels <br />of 12%. <br />Lot 5 <br />Lot 6 <br />Lot 7 <br />Lot 8 <br />20% steep slopes with a small pond. <br />30-40%’ Hamel Soils. . <br />70-80% has slopes in excess of 12%. <br />70-80% has slopes in excess of 12%. <br />By copying this letter to Mr. Gordon Coffin, I am requesting <br />that he submit two copies of his November 21 submittals to you. <br />Very truly yours. <br />McC^MBSt^UTSON associates, INC. <br />Gi^g FrLnk, P.E. <br />GF:ts <br />pfinied on lecycftd paper <br />f7 ; V**' <br />pV'. .. <br />uir <br /># <br />i\ <br />ni <br />. <br />1 TO; <br />I-ROM: <br />HVfE; <br />P <br />I: <br />SUBJECT: T <br />A’ <br />Here we are <br />the last rer <br />nents, but 1 <br />The survey s <br />It notes the <br />to indicate <br />area were to <br />Although we <br />felt it woul <br />the variance <br />providing a <br />Minimum lot <br />lot as shown <br />ho)ve ver. Th <br />probably be <br />Access to Cc <br />the curve ol <br />situation al <br />Unless the c <br />I would hesi <br />will be pro\ <br />obtaining pi <br />All setback <br />was unable t <br />setback vari <br />PLANNING <br />Mr. 5 ^trs. L <br />conceptual a <br />following CO <br />(1) <br />(2) <br />(3) <br />(4) <br />applica <br />No othe <br />No acce <br />Applica <br />access <br />Justificatio <br />(1) No addi <br />(2) Area is <br />jmi lillliiiliiir---------