10-03-1977 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3S0ta 55343 » proposed it »^ised n our ge the f way . vr ■ recommenda Ipencer at is MIMJTES OF A PLANNING CCM^ISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 18, 1976 - PAGE 5 The ^st, Zconing Administrator stated that Mr. Becker had submitted a revised plan. He had purchased additional land allowing all five lots to meet the necessary requirements. Each lot contains at least 2 acres of dry buildable land (87,120 sq. ft.). Hannah moved, Hake seconded, to approve as submitted subject to a Park Dedication Fee and easements be granted for the roadway which is noted as 50’ wide with a 50’ radius cul-de-sac, with the easement marrowing to 30* along the north side of Lot 5. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0) . KLAUS BECKER 511 N. FERNDALE SUBDIVISICN (PRELIMINARY REVISED (#156) The-Asst. Zoning Administrator explained that no additional material had been submitted; however, Mr. Jim DeSplinter had just approached him and stated he had just signed a purchase agreement for this property. Mr. DeSplinter requested that the Planning Ccmimission give him a future time limit to submit necessary information. The Canmission informed the new applicant that he should provide information on the proposed driveway and what he intended to build, and to also provide a survey. Hake moved, Guthrie seconded, to table this matter to allow the applicant to submit the necessary data as requested at the September 9, 1976, meeting. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). ROBERT JOHNSON 1121 ELMVOOD AVENUE VARIANCE - LOT AREA 6 WIDIH (#164) Mr. and his Attorney Doug Carney were present. They resubmitted the original subdivision proposal after having the Planning Commission Menbers visit the site again. Mr. Ryan had studied the area again and feels that the only acceptable way to subdivide is with two lakeshore lots. Any other way would interfere with his driveway and garage. Some members felt that the lot lines could be arranged to meet the lot width requirement at the building line. After a brief discussion, Pesek moved. Hake seconded, to accept this subdivision proposal based on tlie following: TOM RYAN 1060 TQNKAm ROAD SUBDIVISION (PRELIMINARY) (#170) It is consistent with land - lot on either side is of same width. County approval of any new access road to the south parcel. Two Park Dedication Fees be paid. Ponding area is retained as is. Motion: Ayes - 4 (Pesek, Hake, Guthrie, Hannah), Nays - 2 (Dunlap, Van Nest), Abstain - 1 (McDonald). Chairwoman Dunlap stated as minority opinion that she is opposed because Ais is a new subdivision and cannot vote for any new subdivisions requiring variances. Mr. Olson informed the Comnission that the applicant had no new infoimation at this time. Necessary information would be submitted at the next meeting. Hannah moved, Gutl'.rie seconded, to table this application until the November 1, 1976, meeting. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). G. RAYM3ND 6 RUIH IVOLFE 2925 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE - SIDE YARD . tr ORONO COUNCIL MEtlir. Douglas Carne 1060 Tonkawa Road proposed subdivis meets Orono’s set Johnson on behalf is the last of th and this proposal of the area. Mr. Administrator, re Comnission Minute resubmitted theo after having the site again. Some lines could be ar requirement at th felt that this wo without affecting density of the si recommended appro with a lot width a park dedication any new access ro to retention of t! lot. Motion appr< 1 abstention. Mil was the approval < any variance. I4r, Muhich also si plat will meet al! Butler moved, subdivision reqi Road, be approve Minutes of Octol Nays (1). Coun< Henry Muhich, Bui} stated that I4r. Va approval of a subc acres into 8 pares size of 2 acres Ic Road. The proposal incli exceed 600* in lei the right of way « be required. Non< as wetlands on th« wetlands map in oi should be schedule Planning Commissic Scheduled public I 8:00 P.M. Suggest changes in access through street ext