10-03-1977 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

;t grot corporaticn lued) ilA GRAIN COMRVNY )RTn .ARM DRI\T; qSlON (PRELIMIN.ARY) ‘ROPOS/d. i i ^ 1 i’.' 1it.MINUTES OF A PLANNING CO^WISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 3, 1977 - PAGE 7 Mr. Hacking expressed his concern about being in the middle of a situation where one body approves of one proposal and the other body is in favor of another. He advised that the DNR has reviewed the soundings and has been on the site. They have indicated that the long dock would not be approved. Tlie Commission requested some certification of this and Mr. Hacking replied tliat this was only verbal as Ron Hamack was out of town and he was unshle to obtain a statement. The Planning Commission considered deferring a decision to permit the applicant to submit an alternate proposal wliich would not involve any dredging. Mr. Hacking insisted on a decision, either approval or denial. The Commission informed Mr. Hacking tliat a denial at this time \s'ould only hold up tlie project as tlie applicant would be required to wait six months before submitting another proposal. Mr. Hacking felt a decision sliould be made so the applicant knew liis position. After a lengthy discussion, 'IcDonald moved, Fralim seconded, to table the application and requested the applicant to submit an alternate proposal ,;itli tlie dock extending straiglit out into the lake far enough to miss the spaiming area. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Mr. Hacking requested tliat tlie record show that the applicant had submitted the sounding data as required and that the applicant requested that a decision be made and no action was taken. Tlie Planning Commission reminded Mr. Hacking tliat an alternate proposal had been requested at the last meeting with tlie dock extending beyond tlie fish spa\>aiing area and none had been submitted. Bruce and Lester Kelley were present. Tlie Planning Conroission reviewed a copy of the final plat which indicated all drainage and utility easements as specified by Council. Tlie access and utility easement along the east property line of Lot 2 was not indicated. Bruce Kelley explained that tlicy were planning to redivide this property if some agreement was reached betiveen Mr. Jackson, the prospective buyer of the newly platted Lot 1 and Mr. Plant, tlie property ouner to tlie east. Tliis lot line will be redefined in the future. The Kelley's requested approval of this 3-lot sulidivision at tliis time and tliat the access and utility easements be dedicated on the future proposed plat. Tlie applicant was willing to assure the City of a required utility easement, but requested delay of definite description until an agreement is reached by tlie tliree adjoining property owners. If tile City were to demand tlie easement around Lot 2, any future lot rearrangement of tlie lot would be delayed because of the necessity to vacate said easements before proceedmg with the lot rearrangement. Tlie applicants agreed to provide a conservation easement over the ivetlands area indicated on tlie plat as Outlet A. VICTORIA GRAIN COMPA’iY (continued) (/?200) KELLEY 5 KELLEY, INC. 2325 WATERTOWN ROAD SUBDWISION (FINAL) (#285) A I I * . minutes OF A pla: Vr‘ •, ^ After some discu moved, I lamme rel lat as submitte .750 and final a opinion. Motion The Zoning Admii tliat he had wril concerns and tlu was not present Hass el moved, Gi until the neces: Motion - Ayes ( Dan Lindsay and are requesting construct two n cial district. Mr. Lindsay is duplexes, the c units, for a tc Lindsay stated issue was addre T..e Zoning Adm: 1976, Council r The Planning O policy on dock: there is adequ; to lot width p tlie Cormission instructed to informed tlie d limiting ripar ft. In any de constitute one After some dis recommend appi construction c commercial zor credit. In nc permits at th: sequent applic Abstain (1), ' Mrs. Beck and requesting a ’ side setbacks also proposes house. 'The p hardcover, bu