09-19-1977 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-^-r-iP -VBIflS^:-- • ■ ■ VL OF Mi?jirrns lued) •JOicMso:; an ARM LW: SION CFINy\J.) S03Tr ni MLLaV DRIVT- 5IQN (Fim) :CLE\RY^sinn Ro\n ; APPLICATIGN FOR ^AY marina i’.v ■H N ^tINlr^•S OF A PLANNING COMMISSION ^tt•FTING IIFXn SEPTEMBER 19, 1977 - PAGE 5 considered maintenance dredging as eacli marina liad a permit previous dredging. Nfr. ^fcCleary u'as informed tliat during discussions between staff and the State tlie subject of wlictlier or not there were other alternatives for the storage of these boats was mentioned. Possibly onland storage with a mucli smaller amount of dredging. Mr. McCleary stated that wlien lie talked to tlie DNR they were in favor of tlie dredging. Mr. Olson advised that in his discussion with Mike ^fueller of the DNR he said he liad mixed feeling about this project and was \>rondering if there was another way to do it without liaving to do any extensive dredging. Mr. ffcCleary stated that presently his docks extend 170 ft. into tlie lalce and are going to be cut bark some because of tlie converging property lines. He is working with a pie-shaped piece of water. The Planning Comnission inquired as to Mr. McCleary’s intentions for the use of his land. He answered tliat the City lias not permitted him to reconstruct Ms tavern and he is having problems finding someone to lease the building just as a marina. With dredging, Mr. McCleary said that he could get 64 slips in and probably half that amount witliout tlie dredging because of the redefinition of his lot lines by tfie LMCD. The Conmission suggested dry stack storage. Mr. McCleary felt this would be too costly to operate. Mthougli dredging would also be costly, he felt it would be a permanent solution. He was also advised tJiat all dredging approved by Orono would required removal of the spoils from the watershed. Ifr. McCleary had indicated a disposal direa to tlie rear of tlie proposed building. The Commission was syinpathetic witli Mr. McCleary, but felt there could be some alternative solutions to tliis problem. After some discussion, McDonald moved, Gutlirie seconded, to table tliis application alloMng staff to obtain some documentation as to what tlie detrimental affects of this dredging would be and allowing applicant to come in with an alternative plan. Ntotion - Ayes (4), Nays (0). Mr. Olson stated tliat the applicant is requesting approval of a lot area and width variance for construction of a new home on tliis property. Tracts A and B are not separate parcels and would have to be combined. Mr. Olson also pointed out that the garage doors face the County road and access to this road would require County apnroval. The Commission suggested tliat the curb cut be off Linden Lake. Mr. Evans, the builder, was present. He stated that he would rather liav^e the curb cut off Linden Lane. itiWiBiiii ■ JAMIES }k:CUim (continued) (^294) R. BERGERSON 1065 NORTH .ARM LANE V.ARTANCE - LOT ;\REA P, WIDTH (//298) 1 1 rVa im i I MINUTES OF A PLAI v C nj After a brief disc recommend approval bination of Tracts Hardship: No otlie Nays (0). Dick Walsh of Equi to tlie Conmission use the existing p Tlie existing pylon line and tlie sign of way tliereby nec of the proposed si keeping witli the a sign back at this tliat the owners wo farther back from After a brief disc to recommend appro that tlie size is a is in keeping with have agreed to mov request. Motion - A1 Olson stated th of a variance for tliat is substandar proposals and in e the required setba 'Ir. Upton was the proposed h as tlie previou would be in li meet the lakes Tlie Commission not' the back of tlie pr he would like to u: the fact tliat the i storage and is on . Conmission not to structure. Guthrie moved, Mcl> the "preferred plaj mately on tlie old homes, subject to i Nays (0).