Laserfiche WebLink
*RD sub- <br />► . A <br />* April 4, <br />.ots <br />‘ach portion <br />Lve wetlands <br />jement with <br />>ning <br />5 based upon <br />area, sewer <br />able for the <br />the Planning <br />proper <br />to have <br />h has <br />as <br />sociation <br />ace are <br />1 be filed <br />oject has <br />,ots 1, 2, <br />:res in a <br />dedication <br />been scheduled <br />i <br />A ^ <br />li <br />MINNESOTA <br />Case No. <br />Land Use Applicatiqi <br />Fee yU - ~ <br />Date <br />Street Location of Property:/ <br />Legal Description of Property:fiffffi A-rrAt^^n <br />Owner uNj^<^nvUi4 <br />t. ^7/>67<?3> <br />lone; <br />Type of Request Rezoning <br />Variance <br />A <br />/ <br />y Conditional Use Permit <br />“5— Subdivision Approval <br />— Other <br />Description of Bequest: & <br />AULs^(Owner! <br />Please draw or attach a sketch oi proposed stiuLlme sliCA^u.fe-rollowingT <br />I Indicate North <br />Location on Lot <br />Adjacent Street Name <br />ciatharV <br />I <br />of setback use of adjacent <br />existing buUding. <br />Distances between any proposed stn^tu <br />and structures on adjacent property. <br />6. Dimensions of proposed structure <br />7. Proposed setbacks <br />8. Zoning in force in this area <br />Exhibit Submitted: <br />UI ------------- * - <br />Abstractors or S^t^*the ^^o?reroning <br />_ . _____•______ <br />Petition shovring 50» of property capers within 300 ft. favoring rezoning or variance. <br />) <br />Village recommendations:__________ <br />or..gjoc7^^-ro^u>X tVr.Pfff7T»f.lv IfiHiPQ ML, nflA <br />i <br />mLf. <br />W <br />4’' <br />i , <br />^\»AiA<lO A-liA-l>bEJ <br />■^ajobo^uL___L&riCi. <br />WAgrufttitt <br />iiAt.iiiuLo .V Twrmu <br />____________f <br />4ltoo —rtitict <br />iph- mcia- <br />c.\nju.ic. <br />fO^fur^Mik cKP l4»^ <br />!-■ 'I <br />m <br />?) <br />ii <br />: i <br />The Zoning Administi not on the a^nda he <br />their attention. Mi <br />and inquired about t <br />on his subdivision v <br />Zoning Administratoi <br />reviewed by the Coim <br />After a brief disci^ <br />that this subdivisic <br />Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />There was some disci <br />pond proposals• The <br />removal of aquatic i <br />destroy the filtrati <br />marshes• <br />The Commission cons: <br />clarification of pa: <br />(parks) as a permiti <br />is too broad a term <br />After a brief discit <br />was definitely a ca <br />conntercial zones fo: <br />Hannah moved, Dunla; <br />amending the ordinal <br />any residential zon< <br />Menber Dunlap submi <br />Administrator. 0th' <br />would be forwarded <br />Richard Tuthill and <br />plan and model of t <br />of land in Minneton <br />north of County Roa <br />at the intersection <br />proposed density wo <br />The preliminary mod <br />approximately 3-5 u <br />The applicants pres <br />seme direction from <br />than determining th <br />the Conmission indi <br />The proposal would <br />PRD approval and jo <br />Minnetonka Beach.