My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-01-1977 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
08-01-1977 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2024 11:10:02 AM
Creation date
1/24/2024 11:08:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
^ M3RAN <br />led) <br />OF MINUTES <br />JULY 18, 1977 <br />minutes of a planning CaWlSSlON MEETING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 - PAGE 3 •it.. 1 <br />Mr. Olson advised that Council had referred this item <br />back to the Commission for reccjnsideration. IVhen <br />applicant was advised of this action, he informed the <br />City office that because of prior commitments he would <br />not be able to attend this meeting. <br />Hassel moved, Dunlap seconded, to table^is application <br />until the next meeting. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />The Asst. Zoning Administrator advised that preliminary <br />and final subdivision approval had been granted approx <br />imately one year ago to this property. . However, the <br />park dedication fee was never paid. <br />was subject to a park dedication fee of $2,000 and <br />no lake access easement be given for Lot B. <br />Mr. Reardon was present. Conmission reyievved final <br />proposal with applicant. Planning Commission advised <br />applicant tliat it would be necessary to record access <br />ea^ments for Lot A through Lot B and that Lot B would <br />have no riparian rights. <br />Hassel moved, Guthrie seconded, to recommend final <br />subdivision approval as submitted subject to access <br />easements being recorded for Lot A through Lot B, <br />no riparian access for Lot B and a park dedication <br />fee of $2,000. hfotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />The Asst. Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Rhode <br />has submitted a new set of plans. He has rel(^ated <br />the house so that the lake edge of the house is in <br />line with the Becker house next door. The current <br />proposal has been moved back 35 ft. from the original <br />location. <br />Jack Rhode, his architect Bob Peterson, and builder <br />Jerry Guetzkow were present. Mr. Rliode explained that <br />he was withdrawing his TC<‘{uest to use the existing <br />structure as a guest house. He is now proposing to <br />use this building for storage. In temns of the topo <br />graphy of the land, he preferred the original proposal <br />and felt that moving the house farther back was a <br />merit of compromise. <br />Mr. Peterson advised that there would be more costs <br />involved with the current proposal because the <br />farther back you go on the lot tlie more fill itwill <br />take. Tliere would also be a problem with the grade. <br />Chairman McDonald felt that after visiting the site <br />again this proposal had less of an impact to tlic Becker <br />property because the side of Mr. Becker’s home affected <br />by the proposal has no windoi^/s, 'This proposal also <br />appears to be more in line with the Becker home. <br />ROBERT F. IVHITE <br />320 hOODHILL ROAD <br />VARIANCE - REAR YARD SETBACK <br />(#275) <br />LAURF31CE REARDCN <br />(PHILLIP DYKSTRA) <br />3080 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />SUBDIVISION (FINAL) <br />(#73) <br />JACK RHODE <br />1410 BOHNS roiNT ROAD <br />VARIANCE - LOT AREA 5 WIDTH <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERNHT <br />(#210) <br />i <br />Vi <br />* <br />t ^ ■' <br />4 <br />minutes OF A PLA] <br />Mr. 5 Mrs. Becke <br />concerns and obj <br />these were: <br />(1) <br />(2) <br />(3) <br />(4) <br />(5) <br />(6) <br />When Avas th <br />understand! <br />before the <br />grant varia <br />Did prior c <br />Lot in ques <br />140 ft. wic <br />His nearest <br />he purchase <br />that the Ic <br />opposed to <br />Becker’s pi <br />(7) <br />(8) <br />level would <br />A variance <br />this propel <br />granted anc <br />Becker fell <br />It is his i <br />10 ft. fror <br />proposed di <br />close to tJ <br />No more the <br />lot. <br />He requested thj <br />items into accoi <br />After all the c< <br />parties involve* <br />proposal before <br />In addressing t <br />Planning Cannis <br />was a substanda <br />The variance gr <br />forth at that t <br />conditions coul <br />Due to the fact <br />request to use <br />there would be <br />Conceming the <br />Orono code does <br />Commission alsc <br />average setback <br />adjacent and ne <br />they felt that <br />resolve this ma
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.