Laserfiche WebLink
-A-, <br />7 <br />,.7v'' <br />/ <br />i-; '■'.^. <br />* 4i <br />i % <br />’■'V <br />% <br />7^- <br />n <br />it* <br />? <br />1 <br />. -?* ;i <br />VI <br />^ % <br />f < <br />V E’ <br />% <br />CITY OF ORDNO, MINNESOTA <br />REGUIAR PLANNING CCMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with <br />the following members present: Chairwoman McDonald, <br />Menbers Guthrie, Dunlap, Hurr, Hosfield, Hassel and Hannah. <br />Also present: Asst. Zoning Administrator A1 Olson. <br />Chairwoman McDonald announced that this was the time and <br />place for a public hearing on the petition of Kelley and <br />Kelley for a subdivision of pr^erty located at 2325 <br />Watertown Road. The Asst. Zoning Administrator presented <br />the Notice of Public Hearing and the Affidavit of <br />Publication. <br />Mr. Olson stated that the applicant is requesting a <br />division of his property into tliree parcels. Each lot <br />would exceed the minimum 2 acre, 200 ft. lot width <br />requirements. Mr. Olson also pointed out that although <br />there are no wetlands on Lot 1 and Lot 2, a portion of <br />the southeast comer of Lot 3 is designated as marshland <br />on our wetlands map. <br />Bruce Kelley was present. Mr. Kelley contended that <br />there are no wetlands on this property. He advised that <br />they are proposing to sell the large parcel. Discussed <br />access alternatives and the desireability of one access <br />directly from Watertown Road. Applicant says that this <br />was not shown because it would interfere with the green­ <br />house operations and septic system installation. <br />After all the public were heard, the piblic hearing was <br />closed at 7:40 p.m. <br />After a brief discussion, Guthrie moved, Hannah seconded, <br />to recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to <br />a park dedication fee. Ifotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />Chairwoman McDonald announced that this was the time <br />and place for a public hearing on the petition of Hamilton <br />Moran for a subdivision of property located at 2965 Casco <br />Point Road. The Asst. Zoning Administrator presented tlie <br />Notice of Public Hearing and the Affidavit of Publication. <br />Mr. Ntoran was present. Subdivision is based on existing <br />property on Casco Point Road which for many years has <br />contained two separate homes. This subdivision would <br />enable each dwelling to have its o\%ti property. Each <br />lot would slightly exceed the 1/2 acre area requirement <br />based on the street vacation request which is part of <br />this application. Lot A meets the SO5 requirement <br />for lot width at tlie shore but narroivs at the street. <br />Lot B exceeds the minimum at the street but narrows to <br />20 it. at the shore. Due to the required 10 ft. setback <br />on each side, the mirimum dock setback would not be met. <br />ATTEND\NCE - 7:30 P.M. <br />PUBLIC HE\RING - 7:30 P.M. <br />KELLEY § KELLEY <br />2325 WATERTOls'N ROAD <br />SUBDIVISION (PRELIMIM\RY) <br />(#285) <br />'1^ <br />'s <br />r i| <br />PUBLIC HEARING - 7:45 P.M. <br />HA^^ILTON MORAN <br />2965 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />SUBDIVISION (PRELIMINARY) <br />STREET VACATION <br />(#289) <br />S <br />‘ t' <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNH <br />There were no commei <br />closed the public h< <br />and opened the publ] <br />The Asst. Zoning Adr <br />street vacation wou] <br />and Mr. ^foran. The <br />location on Casco P( <br />actual location of 1 <br />shown on the map is <br />exists today and do€ <br />way or future utilit <br />Point Road where the <br />the traveled road is <br />property. <br />This proposal as sut <br />property lines to re <br />line of the existing <br />a 20 ft. roadway. C <br />right of way for pri <br />for public roads. C <br />the city engineer re <br />After all the commen <br />closed at 8:18 p.m. <br />The Commission conti <br />and street vacation, <br />ing the platting pr <br />sufficient right of <br />Commission felt that <br />centerline was inade <br />for public roads sho <br />Commission noted tha <br />are based on a 10 ft <br />their concern about <br />60 ft. road width be <br />available to them at <br />After a lengthy disc <br />the subdivision and <br />staff to come back w <br />ever assumptions are <br />situation such as th <br />Council as to the ov <br />other affected prope <br />Hosfield moved, Hass <br />Planning Commission ; <br />Motion - Ayes (7), N <br />f:.-