My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
11-08-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 1:06:18 PM
Creation date
1/23/2024 1:01:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING ON FLAG LOT ISSUES <br />August 18, 1993 <br />The Planning Commission of the City of Orono held a public hearing to discuss Flag Lot <br />Issues pursuant to notice at 7:00 p.m.. Wednesday, August 18, 1993 at the Orono Council <br />Chambers. Chairman Charles Schroeder itJ Planning Commission members Candy Rowlette, <br />Sandy Smith and Charles Nolan were present. Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant <br />Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffrcn, and Recorder Lin Vee were present <br />representing staff. <br />Chairman Sc.hroeder called the meeting to order e::plaining that the meeting was to <br />discuss the issue of flag lots in general terms and asked Gatfron to provide some general <br />information and history about flag lots in Orono. <br />Gaffron defined flag lots from resource books. "Flag lots are permitted in rural and <br />developing municipalities to permit development ot back land areas while still maintaining their <br />rural character." A fiag lot could be defined as typically separated from a public or private road <br />by another lot which gains access to the public or private road via a narrow corridor that is <br />typically 10’-50* in width. "The usual requirements for a fiag lot are as follows: minimum lot <br />area at least twice the area in tlie zone where located e.xclusive of the right-of-way connecting <br />the'lot with the public road; minimum front, side and rear yard requirements to be met on the <br />portion e.xcluding the right-of-way;yninimum of 20 ’ and maximum of 50 for right-o*-way; not <br />more than 1 flag lot for each right-of-way; rights-ot-way should be a minimum distance apar <br />of at least the minimum lot width in the p; rticular zone." <br />This definition does not necessarily relate to anything the City has done or is presently <br />doing. Pnor to our Shoreland Ordinance, there were a couple methods to look at subdivision <br />of a narrow, long piece of property that was either on or off the lake and someone wanted to <br />create a back and front lot. <br />In a lakeshore siniation. one method is to create a flag lot that abuts the lake and a back <br />lot that abuts the street without lakeshore access. The opposite situation would never be allowed <br />because the lake lot would need to have a shoreline width equal to the requirement for the <br />district. The Code has said that lot width is measured at the frtmt or street setback line from <br />the side lot line Gaffron illustrated these situations Prior to the recent Shoreland Ordinance, <br />the lot width for a lakeshore lot would be measured at the 15' setback and die street setback and <br />a flag lot would require a variance. With the Shoreland Ordinance, the width is measured at the <br />shoreline and at the 75 ’ setback but at no other locations, making a flag lot a possibility. <br />To avoid variances in the past, a private easement was granted to access the street. <br />Another way was to create an outlet, typically a private driveway outlet, owned by the person <br />who uses it. This allows the back lot to meet the width standard without a variance. The outlet <br />area is not considered with the dedicated area for either the back or front lot.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.