Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Immediate competitors do not have fire lanes. <br />He feels he is being discriminated against with a required fire lane smce other <br />businesses do not have this requirement. <br />Surrounding communities do not require fire lanes, including Wayzata. Plymouth, <br />Shorewood, Tonka Bay, and E.xcelsior. <br />Pictures were passed around of neighboring businesses that do not have <br />designated fire lanes. <br />but bv Mike Palm, one of the Fire Marshals. <br />tT, “• r—- <br />overlooks the gas pumps. <br />Peterson asked if O’Sullivan had ever received a registered letter from the Chief of Police of <br />Orono stating that a fire lane was required on the property. O’Sullivan responded that he ha <br />not. <br />Peterson then asked Gaffron to look at Orono Code Section 9.34, Section 7 (C) wtere * <br />discussion about the Fire .Marshall and the Mound Fire Chief. Peterson quoted. The Ch <br />Police is herebv empowered to order the esublishment. designation and maintenance of '“-s <br />on public or prf vate^operty wherever and to whatever estent as he may determine is «“OMbly <br />necessarv to ensure open and unobstructed emergency access. In this ‘'f <br />Chief (not the Fire Chief) may confer with and accept the recommendations of the Buildi^ <br />Official or the Fire Chief of the applicable Fire Service District. The Fire Lane O^er stall ta <br />in wnting and shall be served in person or by registered letter upon the prope^ fl,, has <br />record " Peterson suggested that this states it is not the Fire Chief but the Police Chief J <br />m^right t“nate'L fire lane, and asked why the Chief of Police tad not wntten such a <br />letter. <br />O’Sullivan noted that Chief Sullivan tad not taken the issue up with him but had let others deal <br />with the problem. <br />Schroeder thought the requirement for fire lanes would have to be consistent and should no. be <br />anniied incotisistentlv to the detriment of the business owner.