My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
10-11-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2024 12:39:01 PM
Creation date
1/19/2024 12:34:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File ^1854 <br />September 8, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Property Owners List <br />C - Plat Map <br />D - Hardcover Fact Sheets 75-250’ <br />E - Hardcover Fact Sheets 250-500’ <br />F - Proposed Site Plan <br />G - I-egal Building Envelope <br />H - Approved Site Plan with Application #1797 <br />I - Resolution #3237 <br />J - First Floor Plan <br />K - Septic Map <br />L - Elevations <br />M - Floor Plan <br />N - Letter from Property Owner - unsigned <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant proposes a 26’x26’ rear garage addition that will encroach the rear setback <br />yard by 6’ and 14’ within the side yard. Review Exhibits G and J, applicant was asked to <br />determine if garage addition could be moved turther west in order to reduce intensity of setback <br />variance. Applicant claimed that the addition would block the main view windows of kitchen <br />and portion of screen porch addition. Applicant has not provided a site plan showing location <br />of driveway accessing garage. Staff has asked the applicant to provide an updated site plan for <br />the current revjc v. Anderson has advised that the existing drive to the west will be removed <br />and new access w ill come from drive to east. Hardcover fact sheet should be updated including <br />backout apron in driveway and major reductions of hardcover with removal of drive. There are <br />no hardcover concerns as there is only 17.9% hardcover within a zone that allows 30%. <br />Review Exhibit K. parage addition will require the installation of a new septic system. <br />Applicant will be required to provide septic testing for a minimum 4 bedroom design. There <br />is adequate area to west of property. <br />In the review of Applica.»; n ’97 that involved the second story expansion, the major <br />issue for thai review was the visua; irr.pact of the second story upon the residence t^* the east. <br />Review Exhibit H, applicant was required to plant five 8-10’ high evergreen 7 ’ apart along the <br />cast 'idc of the residence just to the west side of the existing drive. Review the east lot line <br />upon your site inspection to determine if there is any impact of the garage addition to the rear <br />upon the views from east. Staff has received only one letter from a neighbor who wished to <br />remain an'inymous (Exhibit N).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.