10-11-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning Memo ^1850 September 14, 1993 Page 2 sloping of the concrete was to direct drainage to the north and eventually to the lake. The paved area adjacent to the proposed garage stall would be needed to preserve integrity of new addition and also foundation of residence. He noted the residence was located within a major drainage collection or low area for the local watershed and of the need to protect foundation of structure by redirecting surface runoff away from structure. Don Herstein, Mr. Spinner’s contractor, will be present at your meeting to present photographs depicting the drainage patterns on die property and other information pertaining to protection of foundations given the uniqueness of topography. The following ordinances are pertinent for the review of the amended application: Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) A.As already noted in the earlier review, the garage addition to be installed at the lakeside of the existing residei. e will be located in front of the average lakeshore setback as the entire residence is located in front of the average lakeshore setback line, review Exhibit F. B Lakeshore setback variance Required = 75 ’ Existing = 57 ’ Proposed = 65’ Variance for new structure = 10’ or 13.3% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover A.0-75 ’ setback area = 10,822 s.f. Existing = 2, 697 s.f. or 24.92% Proposed = 1,931 s.f. or 17.8% (addition of 209 s.f. of new structural hardcover and removal of 766 s.f. of nonstructural hardcover) 75-250’ setback area = 28,040 s.f. Existing = 12,089 s.f. Proposed = 9,122 s.f. or 32.5% (removal of 96 s.f. of concrete area/planter boxes, 2,871 s.f. plastic underliner) Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - I ot coverage Total lot area « 42,432 s.f. Allowed = 6,364.8 s.f. or 15% Existing = *6,440 s.f. or 15.1% Proposed = 6,704 s.f. or 15.7% Variance — 339.2 s.f. or .7%